Compositions and methods for inhibition of mmp:mmp-substrate interactions

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides compounds for disrupting the binding of a matrix metalloprotease (MMP) protein to a substrate protein at an interaction site other than the protease catalytic site. In particular the inventive compounds inhibit the MMP&#39;s ability to cleave a substrate protein. In some cases the compound may prevent activation of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ). The compounds are preferably polypeptide fragments of the hemopexin-like domain of the MMP, but may be mimetics thereof or peptides or mimetics of the portion of the MMP substrate protein to which the MMP interacts.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/263,443, filed Apr. 28, 2014, entitled “Compositions and Methods for Inhibition of MMP:MMP-Substrate Interactions”, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/269,518, filed Oct. 7, 2011, issued Apr. 29, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,710,014, which claims benefit of priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/391,446, filed Oct. 8, 2010, each of which is incorporated by reference herein, in the entirety and for all purposes.

SEQUENCE LISTING

A sequence listing submitted in computer readable format is hereby incorporated by reference. The computer readable file is named P224717supplementarysequencelist_ST25.txt, was created on Sep. 22, 2015, and contains 264 kilobytes.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to peptides, peptide-like mimetic compounds, and methods of using same in inhibiting proteolytic interactions between the hemopexin domain of matrix metalloprotease (MMP) and substrate proteins. In some embodiments, the present invention may be used to inhibit activation of Transforming Growth Factor β.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease affecting joints following (a) cartilage injury; (b) exposure to excessive load-bearing, or repetitive use; or (c) general aging. OA affects 10% of the world's 60 years and older population. It is characterized by joint pain and dysfunction, degradation of joint cartilages, decreased proteoglycan content in articular cartilage, production of osteophytes (calcified tissue in the margins of the articular cartilage) and fibrosis of the synovial lining of the joint. The unchecked actions of MMPs and elevated activation of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) have been implicated as a primary cause for osteoarthritic cartilage degradation.

TGFβ biological activity is modulated by protease-mediated activation to disassemble latency complexes. TGFβ is secreted as a small latent complex that is covalently associated with latent TGFβ binding protein 1 (LTBP1) to form the TGFβ large latent complex. LTBP1 anchors the TGFβ large latent complex (TGFβ LLC) to the extracellular matrix (ECM). This complex must be released from the extracellular matrix in order for TGFβ to become activated for signaling. TGFβ is secreted as a small latent complex in non-covalent association with its N-terminal latency associated peptide, β-LAP. β-LAP and LTBP1 have been implicated in proper processing, secretion, and guidance of the TGFβ LLC to the ECM for storage. Analysis of TGFβ distribution in bone indicates that the bulk of TGFβ is stored in the ECM as a 100 kD TGFJ3 small latent complex (TGFJ3 SLC) and a 270 kD TGFβ LLC. TGFβ is only capable of binding the signaling receptor complex in its mature, 25 kD, homodimeric form. Therefore, activation must occur through a tightly controlled series of proteolytic steps. Plasmin, elastase, chymase, thrombospondin, MMP9, MMP3 and MMP13 have all been implicated in activation of TGFβ resulting in release of the mature receptor-binding homodimer. In addition, an alternatively spliced short form of LTBP1 can form the large latent complex with TGFβ. It has been demonstrated that this form of the TGFβ LLC including the short LTBP1 can be more readily removed from the extracellular matrix.

MMP inhibitors, such as batimastat, marimastat, CGS-27023A, and prinomastat, have been used to treat OA. However, those attempts have resulted in severe side-effects known as MMP-induced musculoskeletal syndrome which includes joint stiffness, inflammation, and symptoms manifested as pain in the hands, arms, and shoulders. Therefore, there remains a need for compounds and methods for inhibiting activation of TGFβ, and treating OA as well as other TGFβ-associated indications without the adverse effect of MMP-induced musculoskeletal syndrome.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The presently disclosed novel compounds and methods described herein aid in inhibiting the binding of MMPs to target substrate proteins. In some cases the inventive compounds may aid in preventing cleavage of MMP substrate proteins. Substrate proteins include Latent TGFβ Binding Protein 1 (LTBP1), collagen, aggrecan, perlecan and fibronectin. Exemplary MMPs include MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP7, MMP8, MMP9, MMP11, MMP12, MMP13, MMP14, MMP15, MMP16, MMP17, MMP19, MMP20, MMP21, MMP23B, MMP24, MMP25, MMP27, MMP28, MMP29.

In one embodiment, the compounds and methods may comprise peptide sequences derived from the hemopexin domain of an MMP protein. In some embodiments the compounds and methods are used to inhibit cleavage, by MMP, of Latent TGFβ Binding Protein 1 (LTBP1), preventing the release of activated transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) from the LTBP1 complex. In one particular embodiment the presently described compounds and methods aid in inhibiting the binding of the hemopexin domain of MMP13 to LTBP1.

The disclosed invention provides compounds and methods of using same having matrix metalloprotease (MMP) inhibitory activity without affecting the enzyme's catalytic domain. In some embodiments, the presently disclosed compounds and methods inhibit binding of the MMP protein to a substrate protein by disrupting binding at non-catalytic sites. In various embodiments, the compounds prevent the binding of MMP proteins and substrate proteins by binding to the substrate protein at or near the MMP biding site. In some embodiments the MMP binding site may be a calcium-binding, EGF-like domain.

The present inventors have discovered that certain MMPs function by interacting with substrate proteins at the MMP hemopexin-like domain. In some MMP proteins, the hemopexin-like domain and the catalytic domain may be located at different, physically separated portions of the enzyme. The MMPs include MMP13, MMP14, MMP16, MMP2, MMP9, MMP19, MMP17, MMP15, MMP20, MMP1, MMP24, MMP25, MMP3, MMP 21, MMP28, MMP8, MMP12, MMP27, MMP11, and MMP10.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides compounds having matrix metalloprotease 13 (MMP13) inhibitory activity. In particular the compounds inhibit MMP13's ability to cleave LTBP1, thereby, inhibiting the activation of TGFβ. Because the disclosed compounds inhibit TGFβ activation, they are useful in combating conditions to which TGFβ activation contributes. Diseases and conditions involving dis-regulation of TGFβ include cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis (OA). Accordingly, the present invention also provides pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treating such conditions.

In another embodiment, the present invention relates to compounds having MMP13 inhibitory activity and TGFβ activation dysregulation activity. In one particular embodiment, the compound is a peptide fragment of the hemopexin-like (1PEX) domain of the MMP13 protein. In some embodiments, the compound includes peptide-like or non-peptide compounds. In various embodiments, the compound may be a mimetic compound designed to mimic the size, shape, charge, and binding characteristics of the all or a portion of a hemopexin domain or binding surface of a hemopexin domain.

One particular polypeptide sequence of a 1PEX domain of MMP13 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 1. Fragments of the 1PEX domain active for inhibiting TGFβ activation can be identified as shown in Example 2 below. Bioinformatics is used to identify candidate fragments that can interact with latent TGFβ binding protein (LTBP 1). Those candidate fragments are then tested for their ability to inhibit TGFβ activation. Preferably, the fragment contains at least 6 amino acids, more preferably 6 to 50 amino acids, most preferably about 19 amino acids. The preferred fragments of SEQ ID NO: 1, suitable for inhibiting MMP13-LTBP 1 interaction, and subsequent TGFβ activation comprise; amino acids 17-26; amino acids 93-111; amino acids 101-150; amino acids 109-147; amino acids 125-147; amino acids 151-192; amino acids 160-180; amino acids 51-100; amino acids 60-83; amino acids 1-50; amino acids 16-50; amino acids 168-186; and amino acids 109-129.

In various embodiments the inventive compound may disrupt a protein:protein interaction that is between a MMP and a substrate protein, wherein the interaction is not mediated by the hemopexin domain of MMP and/or the calcium-binding, EGF-like domain of a substrate protein. Thus, in one embodiment the inventive compound may be derived from an MMP protein but have no homology to a hemopexin domain.

In various embodiments, the inventive peptide may be non-identical to the peptides fragments of the MMP protein. In some embodiments, the inventive compound may be greater than about 95% identical or similar to a peptide disclosed herein, or greater than about 90%, about 85%, about 80%, about 75%, about 70%, about 65%, about 60%, about 55%, about 50%, about 45% about 40%, about 30%, or about 20% identical or similar to a peptide sequence disclosed herein. For example, where one inventive compound comprises amino acids 93-101 of SEQ ID NO: 1, other inventive compounds may be 95% identical to that peptide. In some embodiments the non-identical amino acids may be natural amino acids, non-natural amino acids, may be a modified version of the identical amino acid, conservative amino acid substitution, non-conservative amino acid substitution, or a small molecule with a property very similar to that of the non-substituted, non-modified, amino acid. Non-natural and derivatized amino acids are readily available from common suppliers of chemical reagents, for example, Sigma-Aldrich. In some embodiments, the native amino acid may be substituted with a small molecule that lacks a peptide backbone.

In yet another embodiment, the present invention relates to methods for inhibiting the activation of TGFβ, by contacting LTBP1 with the inventive compound to prevent cleavage of LTBP1 by a MMP. Preferably, the MMP-LTBP1 interaction disrupted by the inventive compounds is between LTBP1 and MMP14, MMP13, MMP9, MMP3 or MMP2.

In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to methods for inhibiting the activation of TGFβ by contacting the MMP with an amount of a compound according to the present invention effective to inhibit the activation of TGFβ. In some embodiments the inventive compound may comprise peptide sequences similar to a region of a substrate protein, for example, LTBP1. In further embodiments, the region of the substrate protein may be a calcium-binding, EGF-like domain.

In a further embodiment, the invention also relates to methods for treating a mammal suffering from osteoarthritis or cartilage degeneration by administering to the mammal an amount of a compound according to the invention sufficient to alleviate the effects of osteoarthritis or cartilage degeneration. In some embodiments the inventive compound may be administered locally or systemically. In various local administration embodiments, the administration may be by injection, patch, cream, lotion, etc. In some embodiments where systemic administration is appropriate, for example osteoarthritis, administration of the inventive compound may be oral or nasal, for example, a nasal spray.

In further embodiments, the present invention relates to compounds for inhibiting the interaction of MMP13, MMP14, MMP16, MMP2, MMP9, MMP19, MMP17, MMP15, MMP20, MMP1, MMP24, MMP25, MMP3, MMP21, MMP28, MMP8, MMP12, MMP27, MMP11, and MMP10 and their substrates, without affecting the catalytic domain. The amino acid sequence for the substrate interacting, hemopexin-like domain of MMP13 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 1; MMP14 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 2; MMP16 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 3; MMP2 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 4; MMP9 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 5; MMP19 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 6; MMP17 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 7; MMP15 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 8; MMP20 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 9; MMP1 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 10; MMP24 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 11; MMP25 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 12; MMP3 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 13; MMP21 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 14; MMP28 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 15; MMP8 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 16; MMP12 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 17; MMP27 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 18; MMP11 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 19; and MMP10 is depicted in SEQ ID NO: 20.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic showing a model of MMP13 release of TGFβ from the large latent complex with LTBP 1.

FIGS. 2A-2C show that hypertrophic chondrocytes produce a novel large latent TGFβ complex. (A) Day 19 embryonic chick tibial growth plates were extracted, immunoprecipitated with antiserum to LTBP-1 or MMP13 and immunoblotted with antiserum to TGFβ. Lane 1, immunoprecipitated with LTBP-1 antiserum; Lane 2 immunoprecipitated with MMP13 antiserum; Lane 3 immunoprecipitated with pre-immune serum IgG. LLC=TGFβ large latent complex; LAP=TGFβ latency associated peptide; TGFβ=active TGFβ homodimer (B) Day 14 rat newborn tibial growth plate cartilage was immunoprecipitated with antiserum to TGFβ and immunoblotted with antiserum to MMP13. Soluble LLC=soluble form of the TGFβ large latent complex; Inactive 13=prozymogen form of MMP13; Active 13=activated form of MMP13. (C) Conditioned media from day 5, serum-free, late hypertrophic chondrocyte cultures was incubated with biotin-labeled, TGFβ polyclonal antibody, passed over a strep-avidin magnetic bead column and immunounoblotted with either NIMP13 or LTBP-1 antibodies as described in Materials and Methods. Lefthand lanes=flow through; Righthand lanes=eluted protein.

FIGS. 3A-3B show that hypertrophic chondrocytes produce the short form of LTBP-1. Total RNA was isolated from day 5 alginate early hypertrophic (EH) and late hypertrophic (LH) chondrocytes. Densitometric values are normalized to 18 s rRNA from a sample n>5 separate cultured experiments. Graphs and statistics generated using Prism GraphPad version 3.03. (A) expression of markers of hypertrophy and (B) expression of the components of the TGFβ LLC.

FIGS. 4A-4C show that hypertrophic chondrocytes produce the components of the TGFβ LLC. Early (EH) and late (LH) hypertrophic chondrocytes were reared in serum-free alginate culture. At day 5, 20 μg equal total protein of conditioned media (soluble), cell-associated matrix (territorial matrix) and CHAPS-extracted cell pellet (cell layer) were electrophoresed under reduced conditions as described in Materials and Methods. (A) TGFβ 2 polyclonal antibody; (B) MMP-13 polyclonal antibody; and (C) LTBP-1 polyclonal antibody. LLC=TGFβ large latent complex; Sol=soluble TGFβ LLC; SLC=TGFβ small latent complex; β-LAP=TGFβ latency associated peptide and H=TGFβ homodimer.

FIGS. 5A-5D show the detection of collagen type X in cell-free matrices. Late hypertrophic chondrocyte cell-free matrices were prepared, immunolabeled with collagen type X polyclonal antibody (red) and nuclei counterstained with Hoechst dye (blue) as described in Materials and Methods. Images were captured with a 100× objective and color compositions constructed using ImagePro software as described in Materials and Methods. (A) cell-free extracellular matrix; (B) cell cytoplasm; (C) secondary antibody control; (D) three-dimensional image capture at 45° of rotation.

FIGS. 6A-6F show TGFβ2, MMP-13, and LTBP-1 localize to both the extracellular matrix and cytoplasm. Two-dimensional analysis of late hypertrophic chondrocytes labeled with polyclonal antibodies: (A) TGF-β2; (B) MMP-13; and (C) LTBP-1. Three-dimensional analysis depicted every 45° of rotation: (D) TGFβ 2; (E) MMP-13; and (F) LTBP-1. Nuclei are counterstained with Hoechst dye (blue). Arrows in panels C and F indicate extracellular matrix staining.

FIGS. 7A-7D show co-localization of MMP-13 and LTBP-1 produced by late hypertrophic chondrocytes. Hypertrophic chondrocytes were double-labeled with MMP-13 (red) and LTBP-1 (green) and nuclei counter-stained (blue) as described in Materials and Methods. Co-localization of the proteins appears as a yellow to orange color. (A1-A3) MMP-13 polyclonal antibody, (B1-B3) LTBP-1 polyclonal antibody, and (C1-C3) co-localized image of the same field. Co-localization within ECM (arrow, panel C3) and cytoplasm (arrow, panel C1) is observed. (D) Three-dimensional analysis of co-localized MMP-13 and LTBP-1 demonstrating staining within the extracellular matrix and cytoplasm.

FIGS. 8A-8C show three-dimensional modeling of MMP13 and LTBP1 non-covalent interaction. (A) MMP13 and LTBP1 short (870 AA toward the C-terminal); Pink: Helices, Yellow: Beta sheets and White: coils. N: Amino terminal. C: Carboxyl terminal. (B) Three-dimensional model of MMP13-LTBP1 interaction; MMP13:green., LTBP1: blue. LLC=large latent complex; H=hemopexin domain; CE=EGF-Ca domain; C=cysteine; E=EGF-like domain; P=N-terminal catalytic domain of MMP13; Linker region=protease-sensitive hinge region of LTBP. (C) Protein-protein interface prediction of MMP13-LTBP1 (SEQ ID NO: 154) complex shown in B. Red: Highest scoring patch (probable binding site). Yellow: Second highest scoring patch. Green: third highest scoring patch.

FIGS. 9A-9D show binding of MMP13-derived peptides with cartilage tissue extracts. Cartilage from day 17 avian embryo sterna was extracted with 0.5% CHAPS buffer and binding assays conducted. Scr=scrambled control; +cold=unlabeled competition. *=p<0.001 compared to scrambled. ***=p <0.001 compared to MMP13-derived peptide by ANOVA with Tukey's Analysis. (A) Resting cartilage and MMP13-19 peptide. (B) Hypertrophic cartilage and MMP13-19 peptide. (C) Hypertrophic cartilage and MMP13-10 peptide D. hypertrophic cartilage and MMP13-6 peptide.

FIGS. 10A-10C show binding of MMP13-derived peptides with isolated extracellular matrix. Binding assays utilizing intact hypertrophic chondrocyte-produced extracellular matrix, LTBP1 immunoprecipitates of hypertrophic chondrocyte-produced extracellular matrix and recombinant protein of the calcium-binding, EGF-like domains of LTBP1 (30) were performed as described in Materials and Methods. *=p<0.001 compared to scrambled. ***=p<0.001 compared to MMP13-derived peptide by ANOVA with Tukey's analysis. (A) Intact hypertrophic chondrocyte-produced extracellular matrix and MMP13-19 or MMP13-10 peptide binding. (B) 25 μg eluates of hypertrophic cartilage immunoprecipitated with polyclonal antibody to LTBP1 and MMP13-19 peptide binding. (C) 15 ng of recombinant protein of the calcium-binding, EGF-like domains and MMP13-19 or MMP13-10 or MMP13-6 peptide binding.

FIG. 11 shows MMP13-19 peptide effects on endogenous activation of TGFβ produced by hypertrophic chondrocytes. Primary sternal chondrocytes from day 17 avian embryos were isolated and plated in alginate culture (2). At day 5 in serum-free culture, 10 nM, 100 nM or 250 nM MMP13 peptide was added to the cultures for 24 hours. Conditioned media was collected and concentrated with Centricon-10 spin filters (Fisher Scientific) and an ELISA (R&D Systems) performed to measure total TGF β produced versus endogenously activated TGF β produced. The graph shows endogenously activated TGF β as percentage of the total TGF β produced. Statistical analysis was calculated by ANOVA with Tukey's test utilizing Prism GraphPad software. n>5 separate culture experiments.

FIG. 12 is a drawing showing the 3-D docking interaction of MMP13, MMP2, and MMP9 with LTBP1. Amino acid sequences of proteins analyzed were obtained from Swiss-Prot data base (www.ebi.ac.uk/swissprot/). Pfam data base (www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/) was used for protein domain analysis. Pfam-A is based on hidden Markox model (HMM) searches, as provided by the HMMER2 package (hmmer.janelia.org/). In HMMER2, like BLAST, E-values (expectation values) are calculated. The E-value is the number of hits that would be expected to have a score equal or better than this by chance alone. A good E-value is much smaller than 1 because 1 is what is expected that sequences are similar by chance. In principle, the significance of a match is predicated on a low E-value. 3D models were generated using I-TASSER database (zhang.bioinformatics.ku.edu/I-TASSER/). Protein docking models were generated using Vakser lab database (vakser.bioinformatics.ku.edu/resources/gramm/grammx/). Protein-protein interface prediction data was generated using PIP-Pred database (bioinformaticsleeds.ac.uk/ppi_pred/index.html). Images were generated using Jmol software (jmol.sourceforge.net/).

FIG. 13: Three dimension model of dog mmp13.

FIG. 14: Collagen triple helix.

FIG. 15: dog MMP13-collagen complex.

FIG. 16: MMP13-derived modifying compound (MC1).

FIG. 17: MMP13-collagen-MC1 complex.

FIG. 18: MC1-aggrecan complex.

FIG. 19: MC2-Fibronectin III complex.

FIGS. 20A-20F; List of various embodiments of the present inventive compounds for interfering with interactions of various MMPs and their substrates

FIGS. 21A-21B, show digestion kinetics of MMP13 catalytic domain on hinge substrate 21A and scrambled substrate, 21B. EDAN-DABSYL fluorescence-labeled REHARGS peptide, representing the protease-sensitive hinge region of LTBP1, was assayed with MMP13 catalytic domain (Enzo Laboratories). Enzyme kinetics were calculated by Michaelis-Menten and non-linear regression software available with the Prism GraphPad program.

-   -   A.) MMP13 enzymatic activity on the REHARGS peptide.     -   B.) MMP13 enzymatic activity on the REHARGS peptide versus a         scrambled control sequence, AREHGSR

FIGS. 22A-22B are bar graphs. FIGS. 22A is a bar graph showing enzymatic activity of various cartilage extracts, and 22B is a bar graph comparing MMP13 to various extracts. CHAPS buffer extracts of avian sterna cartilage were assayed with the fluorescence labeled REHARGS substrate (H) versus a scrambled control sequence (S) as described in the legend for FIG. 5. Extracts of late hypertrophic, early hypertrophic and resting cartilage were assayed.

-   -   A.) MMP13 catalytic domain and the three cartilages were assayed         with Hinge and Scrambled peptide. ANOVA with Tukey's test were         performed with Prism GraphPad software.     -   B.) ANOVA with Tukey's test were performed to compare Hinge         peptide activity in the different conditions.

FIG. 23 shows histopathology slides of chronic treatment of an MIA-induced OA. rat model MIA (3 mg in 50 ul) will be injected into the capsule of the stifle through the infrapatellar ligament of the right knee (Janusz, M. J., Hookfin, E. B., Heitmeyer, S. A. et al. (2001) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9, 751-760; Guingamp, C., Gegout-Pottie, P., Philippe, L., Terlain, B., Netter, P., and Gillet, P. (1997) Arthritis Rheum. 40, 1670-1679) The contralateral knee, injected with saline, will serve as control for the experiment. Disease parameters are clearly measurable within three to four weeks following injection. Animals were injected bi-weekly (weeks 4-12) with various doses of MMP13-19 peptide. Saline and BMP-7 (50 uM) included as negative and positive controls, respectively. Animals were sacrificed, joints dissected, fixed in formalin, decalcified, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Samples were stained with H&E or saffranin O. Grading of OA pathology followed the Mankin Scale (Pritzker, K. P., Gay, S., Jimenez, S. A., Ostergaard, K., Pelletier, J. P., Revell, P. A., Salter, D., and van den Berg, W. B. (2006) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14, 13-29).

FIG. 24 shows safranin-O stained histopathology and grading of acute treatment of a positive control in an MIA-induced model of OA. OA was induced as described in FIG. 23. Animals were injected weekly (weeks 1-4) with various doses of MMP13-19 peptide. Saline and BMP-7 (50 uM) included as negative and positive controls, respectively. Animals were sacrificed, joints dissected, fixed in formalin, decalcified, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Samples were stained with H&E or saffranin O. Grading of OA pathology followed the Mankin Scale (Pritzker, K. P., Gay, S., Jimenez, S. A., Ostergaard, K., Pelletier, J. P., Revell, P. A., Salter, D., and van den Berg, W. B. (2006) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14, 13-29).

FIG. 25 shows hematoxaylin and eosin stained histopathology and grading of acute treatment positive control in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 26 shows safranin-O stained histopathology and grading of positive treatment control (50 uM BMP7) in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 27 shows hematoxaylin and eosin stained histopathology and grading of positive treatment control (50 uM BMP7) in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 28 shows safranin-O stained histopathology and grading of low dose treatment (250 nM MMP13-19 peptide) in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 29 shows hematoxaylin and eosin stained histopathology and grading of low dose treatment (250 nM MMP13-19 peptide) in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 30 shows safranin-O stained histopathology and grading of high dose treatment (2.5 uM MMP13-19 peptide) in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 31 shows hematoxaylin and eosin stained histopathology and grading of high dose treatment (2.5 uM MMP13-19 peptide) in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 32 shows safranin-O, and hematoxaylin and eosin stained mid joint histopathology of low dose peptide inhibitor treatment in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 33 shows safranin-O, and hematoxaylin and eosin stained mid joint histopathology of saline and BMP7 treatment in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 34 shows safranin-O, and hematoxaylin and eosin stained mid joint histopathology comparing BMP7 treatment and high dose peptide inhibitor treatment in osteoarthritis model.

FIG. 35 shows micro computer tomography (micro CT) and table of total and bone volume in patellar and total joint 21 days post OA inducement with and without peptide treatment. Isolated joints were analyzed by Micro CT to measure cortical bone, trabecular bone and cartilage of the patella, femur and tibia, the production of chondrophytes and tissue mineralization in response to treatment. Total mineralization in the patella, femur and tibial cartilages, as well as subchondral bone, were calculated with Scanco μCT software. Micro-CT was conducted with a Scanco uCT 35 (Scanco Medical, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) system. Scans of 15 μm voxel size, 55 KVp, 0.36 degrees rotation step (180 degrees angular range) and a 600 ms exposure per view produced from joints immersed in phosphate buffered saline.

FIG. 36 is a bar graph showing femoral-tibial head joint space for 4 week acute treatment Osteoarthritis control, normal, and peptide treated animals. The joint were X-rayed to measure joint space changes as an indicator of the progression of OA (Messent, E. A., Ward, R. J., Tonkin, C. J., and Buckland-Wright, C. (2005) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13, 463-470).

FIG. 37 is a bar graph showing micro CT calculated ratio of bone volume to total volume for 4 week acute Osteoarthritis control, normal, and peptide treated animals.

FIG. 38 is a bar graph showing average stride for 10 week and 12 week Osteoarthritis control, normal, and peptide treated animals. A stride test was administered weekly during the course of treatment to determine functional mobility in the animals. Briefly, rat's hind paws were inked, the animals timed while they walked a short path and the distance between hind leg strides measured (Hruska, R. E., Kennedy, S., and Silbergeld, E. K. (1979) Life Sci. 25, 171-179)

FIG. 39 shows details cytotoxicity data for treatment in vitro with MMP13-19 peptide. Primary chondrocytes from early and late hypertrophic stage were cultured from Day 17 avian upper sternum. Late hypertrophic chondrocytes were isolated from the core region of the avian sterna. Following 3-4 hours collagenase and trypsin digestion, cells were centrifuged and filtered through 0.45 um Nitex filter. Isolated cells were resuspended in 1.2% alginate and forced into beaded structures with 102 mM CaCl2 and rinsed in 0.15M NaCl for a final density of 5×106 cells/ml. Alginate bead cultures were covered in 2 mls complete serum free DMEM high glucose media including 1 mM cysteine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin. L-ascorbic acid was added to the culture at 30 ug/ml on day 2 and 50 ug/ml on day 5. Cytotoxicity was assessed by Alomar Blue Assay (Invitrogen) on primary chondrocytes and a monocyte cell line incubated for 24 hours with PxTx001-1. Absorbance was recorded at 570 nm for every hour up to 24 hrs to monitor both proliferation and metabolic activity.

FIG. 40 is a bar graph showing mRNA expression in chondrocytes treated with MMP13-19 or a commercially available MMP inhibitor. Time course treatment was performed at 6, 12 or 24 hours with 10 nM, 100 nM, 250 nM PxTx001-1 or 6.5 uM commercially available MMP13 specific inhibitor (Calbiochem). Following a quick dissolution in 0.5M EDTA to release cells from alginate cultures, total RNA was isolated through Trizol method and reverse-transcribed via SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). cDNA samples were subjected to QuantiTech SyBrGreen (Qiagen) real time PCR. Samples were loaded into a 96 well plate in triplicate as 1 ul or 2 ul cDNA for each condition and primers respectively. Expression of markers of chondrocyte maturation (collagen type X, MMP13 and alkaline phosphatase) was compared to an internal standard of 18srRNA using ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Fold difference compared to untreated cultures was graphed using Prism Graph Pad and statistical analysis of one-way ANOVA and standard error of the mean were calculated with associated software.

FIG. 41 is a matrix showing conservation of amino acids in the MMP13-19 inhibitory peptide throughout the MMP family of proteins.

FIGS. 42A-42B show binding of BMP2 with MMP7 (42A) or MMP12 (42B).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Described herein are compounds for inhibiting matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-substrate protein-protein interactions. The present inventive compounds are designed using high definition modeling of the MMP-substrate binding interface. In some embodiments, inhibition does not affect protease activity. In various embodiments, the inventive compounds are fragments of the hemopexin-like domain of a MMP or fragments of an MMP binding protein. In some embodiments, the inventive compound may be a an engineered peptide, peptide derivative, or other molecule comprising a chemical and three-dimensional structure designed to bind either MMP or the MMP-substrate at the binding interface.

In various embodiments, the inventive peptide, peptide derivative, or other peptide-like molecule may be identical to a peptide fragment of a MMP protein. In various other embodiments the inventive compound may be non-identical to a peptide fragment of MMP. In various embodiments the inventive compound may include non-natural amino acids, derivatized natural amino acids, conservative substitution, non-conservative substitutions, or combinations thereof. In various embodiments the inventive compound may be greater than about 95%, about 90%, about 85%, about 80%, about 75%, about 70%, about 65%, about 60%, about 55%, about 50%, about 45%, about 40%, about 30%, or about 20% identical or similar to a peptide sequence disclosed herein. One of skill in the art of peptide synthesis may use various programs and algorithms to determine homology among proteins and peptides. In various embodiments, homology may be determined by a weighted system that counts non-conservative substitutions at a specific position differently than conservative substitutions (based on charge, hydrophobicity, size, etc). On such weighting algorithm may be found at homology database server www.clusta1.org/clustal2/, among others.

One of skill in the art of peptide synthesis may choose to incorporate non-natural amino acids, derivatized amino acids, or small molecules to aid in preventing or reducing degradation of the inventive compound. Design of ligands and small molecules, such as is described by Kubinyi, is well known in the art (Structure-based design of enzyme inhibitors and receptor ligands, Curr. Op. in Drug Disc. and Development, 1998 Vol 1 No 1; incorporated in its entirety by express reference).

In some embodiments, the compound may be referred to as a mimetic. A mimetic is a protein-like chain designed to mimic the pharmacological activity and the structure of a peptide. Mimetics typically arise from modification of an existing peptide in order to alter the molecule's properties. For example, they may arise from modifications (such as using unnatural amino acids, conformational restraints, etc.) to change the molecule's stability or biological activity. Preferably, mimetic, as used herein, means a molecule that is designed to resemble the hemopexin-like fragment and to function as a MMP inhibitor. Because the hemopexin like domain is spaced apart from the catalytic domain on the MMP, the compound inhibits the MMP by interfering with the interaction of the hemopexin-like domain with the substrate. That way, the catalytic domain is not affected.

MMPs include MMP13, MMP14, MMP16, MMP2, MMP9, MMP19, MMP17, MMP15, MMP20, MMP1, MMP24, MMP25, MMP3, MMP21, MMP28, MMP8, MMP12, MMP27, MMP11, and MMP10.

In some embodiments, the inventive compound is a fragment of the hemopexin-like domain of the MMP or mimetics thereof. The polypeptide sequence of hemopexin-like domains for MMP13, MMP14, MMP16, MMP2, MMP9, MMP19, MMP17, MMP15, MMP20, MMP1, MMP24, MMP25, MMP3, MMP21, MMP28, MMP8, MMP12, MMP27, MMP11, and MMP10 are depicted in SEQ. ID NOS: 1-20, respectively. The fragments appropriate for the present invention can be determined using the methods of the Examples below. Bioinformatics is used to select candidate fragments in the hemopexin-like domain of the MMP that can potentially interact with its substrate (e.g., LTBP-1). Those candidate fragments are then tested for their ability to inhibit activation of the substrate by the MMP. Preferably, the fragment contains at least 6 amino acids, more preferably 6 to 50 amino acids, and most preferably 19 amino acids.

The present invention provides compounds and methods for disrupting interactions between matrix metalloprotease (MMP) and a variety of substrate target proteins that interact with MMP through a MMP hemopexin domain. Substrate target proteins include LTBP1, aggrecan, fibronectins, and collagens.

Compounds of the present invention for inhibiting various MMPs are presented in FIG. 20.

The compounds of the present invention can also encompass other fragments of the MMP which can be determined by first generating a three dimension (3D) structure(s) for the molecules of interest (the MMP and its substrate), preferably by computer Modeling. The modeling can be done using software well-known and available in the art, such as the PPI-Pred database from Leads University in the United Kingdom. From the 3D structure, the interacting portions of the hemopexin-like domain of the MMP and the substrate are determined. Branching or non-branching peptides may block the interaction between the MMP and its substrate protein. Inventive compounds, including peptides and peptide mimetics, may be designed from analysis of the sequences of the two proteins at the protein-protein interface. The protein-protein interface may describe the surfaces of the MMP and substrate protein that may interact non-covalently.

Designed compounds and peptides may be tested for their ability to inhibit the MMP-substrate interaction. In some embodiments, the inventive compound may compete with an MMP or its substrate protein for binding.

In some embodiments, the best performing peptides are selected based on in-vitro evaluation-of their ability to inhibit the interaction of interest. For example, if inhibition of TGFβ release is desired, the peptide performance is based on its ability to inhibit TGFβ release in tissue culture system as described in the Examples below. In some embodiments, the “best performing peptide” may be based on its binding affinity for its target, which may be MMP or a substrate protein. In some embodiments the “best performing peptide” may be the compound which has the greatest resistance to degradation.

In the case of MMP9, for example, a peptide may be chosen for its ability to prevent homodimerization. In that case, the peptides are evaluated by examining tissue cultures treated with the peptides by, e.g., western blot for MMP9. In-vitro evaluation techniques are apparent to one skilled in the art depending on the desired MMP and substrate interaction.

In various embodiments of the inventive compound, the compound may disrupt an MMP's ability to bind a substrate protein other than LTBP1. For example, the inventive compound may prevent the biding of MMP13 to collagen type II. In some embodiments, the inventive compounds may be useful in combating conditions such as Matrix degeneration. Accordingly, the present invention also provides pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treating such conditions.

In many embodiments, the inventive compound may be similar to a human MMP protein or a human MMP substrate protein. In other embodiments, the inventive compound may be based upon a non-human MMP protein or MMP substrate protein. In some embodiments, for example, the inventive compound may be homologous to a dog protein, for example dog MMP13. The inventive compound may also be homologous to a dog MMP substrate protein.

In various embodiments the inventive compound may disrupt a protein:protein interaction that is between a MMP and a substrate protein, wherein the interaction is not mediated by the hemopexin domain of MMP and/or the calcium-binding, EGF-like domain of a substrate protein. Thus, in one embodiment the inventive compound may be derived from an MMP protein but have no homology to a hemopexin domain. For example, interactions between MMP7 and BPM2 or MMP12 and BMP2 (FIG. 42), which may be involved in fracture healing and/or fracture nonunion,

In some embodiments, In some embodiments, interface data based upon MMP7 or 12 interacting with BMP2 indicates low energy needed for the interaction (average −10.7 kcal/mol), and a large surface area (Average 967.5 kcal/mol). This data indicates strong binding due to hydrogen bonds and disulfide bonds formations, and may help to explain previously published data (Fajardo et al, Matrix metalloproteinases that associate with and cleave bone morphogenetic protein-2 in vitro are elevated in hypertrophic fracture nonunion tissue. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 September; 24(9):557-63; incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). MMP7 and MMP12 are modeled to interface with different regions of BMP2. These data suggest that at least these two MMPs are not competing and potentially have synergistic effect on BMP2. The negative effect of MMPs on BMP2 function might be through degradation (enzymatic activity or through interfering with dimerization of the BMP protein).

MMP may interact with a variety of substrate proteins. For example, MMPs may interact with For example, For example, MMPs may interact with For example, the substrate protein may be selected from among the group consisting of MCP-1, MCP-2, MCP-3, MCP-4, Stromal cell-derived factor (SDF), Pro-1L-1β, Pro-IL-8, 1L-1-β, IGF-BP, IGF-BP-2, IGF-BP-3, Perlecan, Pro-TNF-α, Pro-MMP-1, Pro-MMP-2, Pro-MMP-2, Pro-MMP-3, Pro-MMP-7, Pro-MMP-8, Pro-MMP-9, Pro-MMP-10, Pro-MMP-13, al-proteinase inhibitor, α1-antichymotrypsin, α2-macroglobulin, L-selection, Pro-TGF-β1, Pro-IL-1β, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-5, FGFR-1, Big endothelin-1, Pregnancy zone protein, Substance P, Decorin, Galectin-3, CTAP-III/NAP-2, GROα, PF-4, Cell-surface IL-2Rα, Plasminogen, Pro-a-definsin, Cell surface bound Fas-L, E-cadherin; β4 integrin, Pro-a-definsin, Cell-surface CD44, Cell-surface BOUND tissue transglutaminase (tTG), 1-selecting, Pro-HB-EGF, e-Cadherin. In many embodiments the MMP substrate protein may, or may not, have a hemopexin domain. In various embodiments, the MMP may interact with a substrate protein by binding the substrate with its hemopexin domain. In other embodiments the interaction between MMP and the substrate protein may be through a domain other than the MMP hemopexin domain.

In some embodiments, the inventive compound may comprise modifications that may be present on the parent MMP or MMP substrate, which the compound is based upon. For example, the MMP or MMP-substrate may include glycosylation and phosphorylation within the region corresponding to the inventive compound. Thus, bioinformatic tools may be used to predict these biochemical modification, and the inventive compounds may be modified to match parent protein features. These modifications may be accomplished by derivativization of the amino acid, or by treating the inventive compound with the appropriate modifying enzyme, for example a kinase in the case of phosphorylation.

In many embodiments, the inventive compound may be modified to increase the thermodynamic stability of the inventive compound. In embodiments where greater thermodynamic stability is desired, one of skill in the art may choose among many available modifications. For example, one of skill in the art may engineer di-sulfide bonds within the inventive compound to increase stability. In other embodiments, the hydrophobic core of the inventive compound may be engineered to be more stable, or secondary or tertiary interactions may be engineered or modified to increase thermodynamic stability.

In various embodiments, the inventive compound may be modified to aid in preventing, reducing, or inhibiting degradation of the inventive compound. For example, degradative stability may be enhanced by terminal modifications, such as acetylation and/or amidation. Other modifications which may prevent, reduce, or inhibit degradation of the inventive compounds may include PEG-ylation and/or use of modified amino acids.

In various embodiments, the inventive compound may be linked to other heterologous peptides or proteins to enhance resistance to degradation or enhance targetting of the inventive compound to a particular tissue or matrix. For example, in some embodiments the inventive compound may be linked to a protein which may have affinity for a protein or molecule present at or near the site where the inventive compound is needed. For example, the inventive compound may be linked to a protein which binds to hyaluronic acid, which may be present within the matrix or tissue where the compound is needed. In some embodiments the linkage may be covalent or non-covalent.

In some embodiments, the inventive compounds may be linked to peptides or proteins that may, in turn, bid specifically to a carrier in a pharmaceutical composition. For example, inventive compounds may include cellulose binding domains, which may be designed to interact with a methylcellulose carrier. Binding to a carrier molecule may aid in prolonging the half-life of an inventive compound.

In an embodiment, the present invention may provide inventive compounds having multiple interfacing domains. In many cases protein-protein interaction involves multiple domains. For efficient modifications, branching molecules might be needed. Bioinformatic tools will be used to determine appropriate spacing and orientations to achieve the best design.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides compounds that have hybrid structure of peptide and small molecules. In these compounds, the peptide portion of the compound will provide specificity while the small molecule will provide function modification roles.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides methods for treating a dog suffering from osteoarthritis or cartilage degeneration by administering to the dog a compound of the invention in an amount sufficient to alleviate the effects of osteoarthritis or cartilage degeneration (100-10,000 microgram). Preferably, the compound is administered directly to the cartilage of the dog, for example, by injection.

The present inventors have discovered a mechanism for the activation of TGFβ by MMP, preferably MMP14, MMP13, MMP9, MMP3, or MMP2. A schematic of the mechanism for MMP13 is shown in FIG. 8. The activation of TGFβ is triggered by the non-covalent interaction of the 1PEX domain of MMP13 with the LTBP-1 (particularly the calcium-EGF-like domains of LTBP-1) of the TGFβ large latent complex (TGFβ LLC). Once non-covalently associated with the TGFβ LLC, the catalytic domain of MMP13 comes into proximity of and cleaves the LTBP-1 protease-sensitive hinge region, thereby releasing a soluble form of TGFβ LLC. That soluble form of TGFβ LLC is more susceptible to proteolytic release of the TGFβ SLC and subsequent activation of the biologically active TGFβ homodimer. The compounds of the present invention are designed to compete with MMP13 for the association with the LTBP-1, and thereby preventing the activation of TGFβ.

It is well known in the art that some modifications and changes can be made in the structure of a peptide, such as those described herein, without substantially altering the characteristics of that peptide, and still obtain a biologically equivalent peptide. In one aspect of the invention, inventive compounds, peptides, and mimetics of the peptides described here may include peptides, compounds, and mimetics that differ from the peptide sequences disclosed herein (especially SEQ ID NOs: 35-123), by conservative amino acid substitutions. As used herein, the term “conserved amino acid substitutions” refers to the substitution of one amino acid for another at a given location in the protein, where the substitution can be made without substantial loss of the relevant function. In making such changes, substitutions of like amino acid residues can be made on the basis of relative similarity of side-chain substituents, for example, their size, charge, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and the like, and such substitutions may be assayed for their effect on the function of the protein by routine testing.

In some embodiments, conserved amino acid substitutions may be made where an amino acid residue is substituted for another having a similar hydrophilicity value (e.g., within a value of plus or minus 2.0), where the following may be an amino acid having a hydropathic index of about −1.6 such as Tyr (−1.3) or Pro (−1.6)s are assigned to amino acid residues (as detailed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,101, incorporated herein by reference): Arg (+3;0); Lys (+3.0); Asp (+3.0); Glu (+3.0); Ser (+0.3); Asn (+0.2); Gln (+0.2); Gly (0); Pro (−0.5); Thr (−0.4); Ala (−0.5); His (−0.5); Cys (−1.0); Met (−1.3); Val (−1.5); Leu (−1.8); Ile (−1.8); Tyr (−2.3); Phe (−2.5); and Trp (−3.4).

In alternative embodiments, conserved amino acid substitutions may be made where an amino acid residue is substituted for another having a similar hydropathic index (e.g., within a value of plus or minus 2.0). In such embodiments, each amino acid residue may be assigned a hydropathic index on the basis of its hydrophobicity and charge characteristics, as follows: lie (+4.5); Val (+4.2); Leu (+3.8); Phe (+2.8); Cys (+2.5); Met (+1.9); Ala (+1.8); Gly (−0.4); Thr (−0.7); Ser (−0.8); Trp (−0.9); Tyr (−1.3); Pro (−1.6); His (−3.2); Glu (−3.5); Gln (−3.5); Asp (−3.5); Asn (−3.5); Lys (−3.9); and Arg (−4.5).

In alternative embodiments, conserved amino acid substitutions may be made where an amino acid residue is substituted for another in the same class, where the amino acids are divided into non-polar, acidic, basic and neutral classes, as follows: non-polar: Ala, Val, Leu, Ile, Phe, Trp, Pro, Met; acidic: Asp, Glu; basic: Lys, Arg, His; neutral: Gly, Ser, Thr, Cys, Asn, Gln, Tyr.

In alternative embodiments, conservative amino acid changes include changes based on considerations of hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity, size or volume, or charge. Amino acids can be generally characterized as hydrophobic or hydrophilic, depending primarily on the properties of the amino acid side chain. A hydrophobic amino acid exhibits a hydrophobicity of greater than zero, and a hydrophilic amino acid exhibits a hydrophilicity of less than zero, based on the normalized consensus hydrophobicity scale of Eisenberg et al. (J. Mol. Bio. 179:125-142, 184). Genetically encoded hydrophobic amino acids include Gly, Ala, Phe, Val, Leu, lie, Pro, Met and Trp, and genetically encoded hydrophilic amino acids include Thr, His, Glu, Gln, Asp, Arg, Ser, and Lys. Non-genetically encoded hydrophobic amino acids include t-butylalanine, while non-genetically encoded hydrophilic amino acids include citmlline and homocysteine.

Hydrophobic or hydrophilic amino acids can be further subdivided based on the characteristics of their side chains. For example, an aromatic amino acid is a hydrophobic amino acid with a side chain containing at least one aromatic or heteroaromatic ring, which may contain one or more substituents such as —OH, SH, —CN, —F, —Cl, —Br, —I, —NO2, —NO, —NH2, —NHR, —NRR, —C(O)R, —C(O)OH, —C(O)OR, —C(O)NH2, —C(O)NHR, —C(O)NRR, etc., where R is independently (C₁-C₆) alkyl, substituted (C₁-C₆) alkyl, (C₀-C₆) alkenyl, substituted (C₁-C₆) alkenyl, (C₁-C₆) alkynyl, substituted (C₀-C₆) alkynyl, (C₅-C₂₀) aryl, substituted (C₅-C₂₀) aryl, (C₆-C₂₆) alkaryl, substituted (C₆-C₂₆) alkaryl, 5-20 membered heteroaryl, substituted 5-20 membered heteroaryl, 6-26 membered alkheteroaryl or substituted 6-26 membered alkheteroaryl. Genetically encoded aromatic amino acids include Phe, Tyr, and Tryp.

An apolar amino acid is a hydrophobic amino acid with a side chain that is uncharged at physiological pH and which has bonds in which a pair of electrons shared in common by two atoms is generally held equally by each of the two atoms (i.e., the side chain is not polar). Genetically encoded apolar amino acids include Gly, Leu, Val, Ile, Ala, and Met. Apolar amino acids can be further subdivided to include aliphatic amino acids, which is a hydrophobic amino acid having an aliphatic hydrocarbon side chain. Genetically encoded aliphatic amino acids include Ala, Leu, Val, and Ile.

A polar amino acid is a hydrophilic amino acid with a side chain that is uncharged at physiological pH, but which has one bond in which the pair of electrons shared in common by two atoms is held more closely by one of the atoms. Genetically encoded polar amino acids include Ser, Thr, Asn, and Gln.

An acidic amino acid is a hydrophilic amino acid with a side chain pKa value of less than 7. Acidic amino acids typically have negatively charged side chains at physiological pH due to loss of a hydrogen ion. Genetically encoded acidic amino acids include Asp and Glu. A basic amino acid is a hydrophilic amino acid with a side chain pKa value of greater than 7. Basic amino acids typically have positively charged side chains at physiological pH due to association with hydronium ion. Genetically encoded basic amino acids include Arg, Lys, and His.

Conservative amino acid changes involve substitution of one type of amino acid for the same type of amino acid. For example, where charge is being conserved, changing Lysine to Arginine is a conservative change, whereas changing Lysine to Glutamic acid is non-conservative. Where size is being conserved, a change from Glutamic acid to Glutamine may be conservative, while a change from Glutamic acid to Glycine may be non-conservative

It will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that the above classifications are not absolute and that an amino acid may be classified in more than one category. In addition, amino acids can be classified based on known behaviour and or characteristic chemical, physical, or biological properties based on specified assays or as compared with previously identified amino acids.

Thus an identical sequence will have the same order and type of amino acids, while a homologous or similar sequence may include conservative or non-conservative amino acid changes without departing from the inventive concept. Thus, for example, a peptide having a single conservative amino acid substitution may have higher similarity to the parent peptide than another peptide where that same single amino acid is substituted with a non-conservative amino acid.

In many embodiments, specific amino acid positions and identities in a sequence may be more important than other positions. In some embodiments, the importance of a position or amino acid may be analyzed by alanine-scanning or by multiple sequence alignment. For example, FIG. 41 shows a multiple sequence alignment of the 19 amino acid peptide sequence of MMP13 with other similar sequences in MMP proteins. This alignment shows that the glycine at position 3 and the proline at position 5 are both highly conserved within this family. Thus, maintenance of the position and identity of these two amino acids may be more important than at other positions. Moreover, the N-terminus of this embodiment of the inhibitory peptide may be more highly conserved than the C-terminus.

In many embodiments, the inventive compounds may be linear. In other embodiments, the inventive compounds may be circular or cyclized by natural or synthetic means. For example, disulfide bonds between cysteine residues may cyclize a peptide sequence. Bifunctional reagents can be used to provide a linkage between two or more amino acids of a peptide. Other methods for cyclization of peptides, such as those described by Anwer et. al. (Int. J Pep. Protein Res. 36:392-399, 1990) and Rivera-Baeza et al. (Neuropeptides 30:327-333, 1996) are also known in the art.

The compounds of the invention may be modified with non-peptide moieties that provide a stabilized structure or lessened biodegradation. Peptide mimetic analogs can be prepared based on the compound of the present invention by replacing one or more amino acid residues of the protein of interest by non-peptide moieties. Preferably, the non-peptide moieties permit the peptide to retain its natural conformation, or stabilize a preferred, e.g., bioactive conformation. One example of methods for preparation of non-peptide mimetic analogs from peptides is described in Nachman et al., Regul. Pept. 57:359-370 (1995). It is important that any modification does not significantly reduce binding affinity of the inventive compound with its target binding substrate. In some embodiments, it may be useful to modify an inventive compound to achieve greater thermodynamic or degradative stability even though the binding affinity may be slightly compromised. The term “peptide” as used herein can embrace non-peptide analogs, mimetics and modified peptides.

Peptidomimetics derivatives could be designed based on the two and three dimensions modeling of effective blocking peptides. A blocking peptide may be used to describe an inventive compound with competes for binding to MMP or a MMP substrate, resulting in disruption of the MMP-substrate interaction. For example, MMP13-19 (amino acids 93-111 of SEQ ID NO: 1) has an alpha helical structure. Peptidomimetic derivatives of indanes, terphenyl, oligophenyls, chalcones, trans-fused polycyclic ethers could be used to design peptidomimetics with alpha helix backbone similar to MMP13-19. For beta-sheet peptides the following methods could be used; use of ferrocene amino acid conjugates where either peptide monomers (Henrick et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 37:5289-5292, 1996, which is incorporated herein by reference) or dimers (Moriuchi et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:68-75, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference), the attachment of the peptides to the cyclopentadienyl core to generate either ‘parallel’ or ‘anti-parallel’ strands (Barisic et al., Chem. Commun. 17:2004-2005, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference) and using both covalent and non-covalent coordination methods to maintain the β-sheet conformation beyond two residues.

The compounds of the present invention may be modified in order to improve their efficacy. Such modification of the compounds may be used to decrease toxicity, increase bioavailability, increase binding affinity, or modify biodistribution. A strategy for improving drug viability is the utilization of water-soluble polymers. Various water-soluble polymers have been shown to modify biodistribution, improve the mode of cellular uptake, change the permeability through physiological barriers, and modify the rate of clearance from the body (Greenwald et al., Crit Rev Therap Drug Carrier Syst. 2000; 17:101-161; Kopecek et al., J Controlled Release, 74:147-158, 2001). To achieve either a targeting or sustained-release effect, water-soluble polymers have been synthesized that contain drug moieties as terminal groups, as part of the backbone, or as pendent groups on the polymer chain.

For example, polyethylene glycol (PEG), has been widely used as a drug carrier, given its high degree of biocompatibility and ease of modification (Harris et al., Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001; 40(7):539-51). Attachment to various drugs, proteins, and liposomes has been shown to improve residence time and decrease toxicity (Greenwald et al., Crit Rev Therap Drug Carrier Syst. 2000; 17:101-161; Zalipsky et al., Bioconjug Chem. 1997; 8:111-118). PEG can be coupled to active agents through the hydroxyl groups at the ends of the chain and via other chemical methods; however, PEG itself is limited to at most two active agents per molecule. In a different approach, copolymers of PEG and amino acids were explored as novel biomaterials which would retain the biocompatibility properties of PEG, but which would have the added advantage of numerous attachment points per molecule (providing greater drug loading), and which could be synthetically designed to suit a variety of applications (Nathan et al., Macromolecules. 1992; 25:4476-4484; Nathan et al., Bioconj. Chem. 1993; 4:54-62).

The compounds encompassed by the present invention may also be attached to magnetic beads or particles (preferably nano-particles) to control distribution of the compound. Such compounds can specifically be targeted using a magnetic field, which naturally increases the effectiveness of the compounds. Methods of attaching peptides to magnetic beads are known in the art and are disclosed, for example in U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,534.

The compounds encompassed by the present invention may be produced by conventional automated peptide synthesis methods or by recombinant expression. General principles for designing and making proteins are well known to those of skill in the art.

The peptides encompassed by the present invention can be made in solution or on a solid support in accordance with conventional FMOC-based techniques. The peptides can be prepared from a variety of synthetic or enzymatic schemes, which are well known in the art. Where short peptides are desired, such peptides are prepared using automated peptide synthesis in solution or on a solid support in accordance with conventional techniques. Various automatic synthesizers are commercially available and are used in accordance with known protocols. See, for example, Stewart and Young, Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis, 2d. ed., Pierce Chemical Co., (1984); Tam et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105:6442, (1983); Merrifield, Science, 232:341-347, (1986); and Barany and Merrifield, The Peptides, Gross and Meienhofer, eds, Academic Press, New York, 1-284, (1979); Fields, (1997) Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis. Academic Press, San Diego); Andersson et al., Large-scale synthesis of peptides. Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.), 55, 227-250 (2000); Burgess et al., J. Pept. Res., 57, 68-76, (2001); Peptides for the New Millennium, Fields, J. P. Tam & G. Barany (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht. Numerous other documents teaching solid phase synthesis of peptides are known to those of skill in the art and may be used to synthesis epitope arrays from any allergen.

For example, the peptides are synthesized by solid-phase technology employing a peptide synthesizer, such as a Model 433A from Applied Biosystems Inc. This instrument combines the FMOC chemistry with the HBTU activation to perform solid-phase peptide synthesis. Synthesis starts with the C-terminal amino acid. Amino acids are then added one at a time till the N-terminus is reached. In some embodiments, non-natural amino acids may be incorporated into a synthetically synthesized peptide. Three steps are repeated each time an amino acid is added. Initially, there is deprotection of the N-terminal amino acid of the peptide bound to the resin. The second step involves activation and addition of the next amino acid and the third step involves deprotection of the new N-terminal amino acid. In between each step there are washing steps. This type of synthesizer is capable of monitoring the deprotection and coupling steps.

At the end of the synthesis the protected peptide and the resin are collected, the peptide is then cleaved from the resin and the side-chain protection groups are removed from the peptide. Both the cleavage and deprotection reactions are typically carried out in the presence of 90% TPA, 5% thioanisole and 2.5% ethanedithiol. After the peptide is separated from the resin, e.g., by filtration through glass wool, the peptide is precipitated in the presence of MTBE (methyl t-butyl ether). Diethyl ether is used in the case of very hydrophobic peptides. The peptide is then washed a plurality of times with MTBE in order to remove the protection groups and to neutralize any leftover acidity. The purity of the peptide is further monitored by mass spectrometry and in some case by amino acid analysis and sequencing.

The peptides also may be modified, and such modifications may be carried out on the synthesizer with very minor interventions. An amide could be added at the C-terminus of the peptide. An acetyl group could be added to the N-terminus. Biotin, stearate and other modifications could also be added to the N-terminus.

The purity of any given peptide, generated through automated peptide synthesis or through recombinant methods, is typically determined using reverse phase HPLC analysis. Chemical authenticity of each peptide is established by any method well known to those of skill in the art. In certain embodiments, the authenticity is established by mass spectrometry. Additionally, the peptides also are quantified using amino acid analysis in which microwave hydrolyses are conducted. In one aspect, such analyses use a microwave oven such as the CEM Corporation's MDS 2000 microwave oven. The peptide (approximately 2 μg protein) is contacted with e.g., 6 N HCI (Pierce Constant Boiling e.g., about 4 ml) with approximately 0.5% (volume to volume) phenol (Mallinckrodt). Prior to the hydrolysis, the samples are alternately evacuated and flushed with N². The protein hydrolysis is conducted using a two-stage process. During the first stage, the peptides are subjected to a reaction temperature of about 100° C. and held that temperature for 1 minute. Immediately after this step, the temperature is increased to 150° C. and held at that temperature for about 25 minutes. After cooling, the samples are dried and amino acid from the hydrolysed peptides samples are derivatized using 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate to yield stable areas that fluoresce at 395 nm (Waters AccQ Tag Chemistry Package). In certain aspects, the samples are analyzed by reverse phase HPLC and quantification is achieved using an enhanced integrator.

In certain embodiments, the peptides of the present invention are made using FMOC solid-phase synthetic methods such as those described above. However, it is also contemplated that those skilled in the art may employ recombinant techniques for the expression of the proteins wherein a nucleotide sequence which encodes a peptide of the invention is inserted into an expression vector, transformed or transfected into an appropriate host cell and cultivated under conditions suitable for expression as described herein below. Recombinant methods are especially preferred for producing longer polypeptides that comprise peptide sequences of the invention. Recombinant techniques are well known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,659,375 discloses several systems, including prokaryotic, yeast, mammalian and insect cell, for production of recombinant peptides. As such, in an embodiment, nucleic acid sequences encoding the peptides or polypeptides of the present invention, and vectors containing those nucleic acid sequences are also contemplated.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides methods for inhibiting the ability of MMP13 to activate TGFβ by contacting the LTBP1 with an inhibiting amount of a compound according to the present invention. Here, the compound of the present invention competes with MMP13 for interaction with LTBP1 thereby acting as a competitive inhibitor of MMP13. By preventing MMP13 from binding LTBP1, the compound of the present invention prevents cleavage of TGFβ LLC, and thereby, inhibits the activation of TGFβ. In that way, the methods of the present invention prevent activation of TGFβ without affecting the catalytic domain of MMP13, thereby, avoiding problems associated with the inhibition of MMP13 by directly affecting its catalytic domain.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides methods for treating a mammal suffering from osteoarthritis or cartilage degeneration by administering to the mammal a compound of the invention in an amount sufficient to alleviate the effects of osteoarthritis or cartilage degeneration. Preferably, the compound is administered directly to the cartilage of the mammal, for example, by injection.

Specific amounts and route of administration may vary, and will be determined in the clinical trial of these agents. However, it is contemplated that those skilled in the art may administer the compounds of the present invention directly, such as by direct intra-joint injection, to effect contact of the TGFβ LLC with the compounds to prevent activation of TGFβ. In a preferred embodiment, the compound of the present invention are administered so to achieve a concentration of about 10-250 nM, preferably 150-250 nM, of that compound in the synovial fluid.

In some embodiments, the inventive compound may be administered by a transdermal patch or topical lotion, balm, cream, etc. In other embodiments, the inventive compound may be delivered systemically through oral, nasal, or intravenous delivery.

Pharmaceutical compositions for administration according to the present invention can comprise the compound of the present invention alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents or active ingredients. Regardless of whether the active component of the pharmaceutical composition is a compound alone or in combination with another active agent, each of these preparations is in some aspects provided in a pharmaceutically acceptable form optionally combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Those compositions are administered by any methods that achieve their intended purposes. Individualized amounts and regimens for the administration of the compositions for the treatment of the given disorder are determined readily by those with ordinary skill in the art using assays that are used for the diagnosis of the disorder and determining the level of effect a given therapeutic intervention produces.

Pharmaceutical compositions are contemplated wherein a compound of the present invention and one or more therapeutically active agents are formulated. Formulations of compounds of the present invention are prepared for storage by mixing said compound having the desired degree of purity with optional pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, excipients or stabilizers (Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 16th edition, Osol, A. Ed., 1980, incorporated entirely by reference), in the form of lyophilized formulations or aqueous solutions. Acceptable carriers, excipients, or stabilizers are nontoxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed, and include buffers such as phosphate, citrate, acetate, and other organic acids; antioxidants including ascorbic acid and methionine; preservatives (such as octadecyldimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride; hexamethonium chloride; benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride; phenol, butyl orbenzyl alcohol; alkyl parabens such as methyl or propyl paraben; catechol; resorcinol; cyclohexanol; 3-pentanol; and m-cresol); low molecular weight (less than about 10 residues) polypeptides; proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, or immunoglobulins; hydrophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone; amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, asparagine, histidine, arginine, or lysine; monosaccharides, disaccharides, and other carbohydrates including glucose, mannose, or dextrins; chelating agents such as EDTA; sugars such as sucrose, mannitol, trehalose or sorbitol; sweeteners and other flavoring agents; fillers such as microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, corn and other starches; binding agents; additives; coloring agents; salt-forming counter-ions such as sodium; metal complexes (e.g. Zn-protein complexes); and/or non-ionic surfactants such as TWEEN™, PLURONICS™ or polyethylene glycol (PEG). In a preferred embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition that comprises the compound of the present invention may be in a water-soluble form, such as being present as pharmaceutically acceptable salts, which is meant to include both acid and base addition salts. “Pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salt” refers to those salts that retain the biological effectiveness of the free bases and that are not biologically or otherwise undesirable, formed with inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid and the like, and organic acids such as acetic acid, propionic acid, glycolic acid, pyruvic acid, oxalic acid, maleic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, benzoic acid, cinnamic acid, mandelic acid, methanesulfonic acid, ethanesulfonic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid, salicylic acid and the like. “Pharmaceutically acceptable base addition salts” include those derived from inorganic bases such as sodium, potassium, lithium, ammonium, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, copper, manganese, aluminum salts and the like. Particularly preferred are the ammonium, potassium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium salts. Salts derived from pharmaceutically acceptable organic non-toxic bases include salts of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines, substituted amines including naturally occurring substituted amines, cyclic amines and basic ion exchange resins, such as isopropylamine, trimethylamine, diethylamine, triethylamine, tripropylamine, and ethanolamine. The formulations to be used for in vivo administration are preferably sterile. This is readily accomplished by filtration through sterile filtration membranes or other methods.

It is understood that the suitable dose of a composition according to the present invention will depend upon the age, health and weight of the recipient, kind of concurrent treatment, if any, frequency of treatment, and the nature of the effect desired. However, the dosage is tailored to the individual subject, as is understood and determinable by one of skill in the art, without undue experimentation. This typically involves adjustment of a standard dose, e.g., reduction of the dose if the patient has a low body weight.

The total dose of therapeutic agent may be administered in multiple doses or in a single dose. In certain embodiments, the compositions are administered alone, in other embodiments the compositions are administered in conjunction with other therapeutics directed to the disease or directed to other symptoms thereof.

In some aspects, the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention are formulated into suitable pharmaceutical compositions, i.e., in a form appropriate for applications in the therapeutic intervention of a given disease. Methods of formulating proteins and peptides for therapeutic administration also are known to those of skill in the art. Administration of those compositions according to the present invention will be via any common route so long as the target tissue is available via that route. Preferably, those compositions are formulated as an injectable. Appropriate routes of administration for the present invention may include oral, subcutaneous, intravenous, transdermal, intradermal, intramuscular, intramammary, intraperitoneal, intrathecal, intraocular, retrobulbar, intrapulmonary (e.g., term release), aerosol, sublingual, nasal, anal, vaginal, or transdermal delivery, or by surgical implantation at a particular site is also used, particularly when oral administration is problematic. The treatment may consist of a single dose or a plurality of doses over a period of time.

The pharmaceutical forms suitable for injectable use include sterile aqueous solutions or dispersions and sterile powders for the extemporaneous preparation of sterile injectable solutions or dispersions. In all eases, the form must be sterile and must be fluid to the extent that easy syringability exists. It must be stable under the conditions of manufacture and storage and must be preserved against the contaminating action of microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi. In some aspects, the carrier is a solvent or dispersion medium containing, for example, water, ethanol, polyol (for example, glycerol, propylene glycol, and liquid polyethylene glycol, and the like), suitable mixtures thereof, and vegetable oils. The proper fluidity is maintained, for example, by the use of a coating, such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersion and by the use of surfactants. The prevention of the action of microorganisms is brought about by various antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, parabens, chlorobutanol, phenol, sorbic acid, thimerosal, and the like. In many cases, it will be preferable to include isotonic agents, for example, sugars or sodium chloride. Prolonged absorption of the injectable compositions is brought about by the use in the compositions of agents delaying absorption, for example, aluminum monostearate and gelatin.

Sterile injectable solutions are prepared by incorporating the compounds of the present invention in the required amount in the appropriate solvent with several of the other ingredients enumerated above, as required, followed by filtered sterilization. Generally, dispersions are prepared by incorporating the various sterilized active ingredients into a sterile vehicle which contains the basic dispersion medium and the required other ingredients from those enumerated above. In the case of sterile powders for the preparation of sterile injectable solutions, the methods of preparation are vacuum-drying and freeze-drying techniques which yield a powder of the active ingredient plus any additional desired ingredient from a previously sterile-filtered solution thereof.

Upon formulation, solutions will be administered in a manner compatible with the dosage formulation and in such amount as is therapeutically effective. The formulations are easily administered in a variety of dosage forms such as injectable solutions, drug release capsules and the like. For parenteral administration in an aqueous solution, for example, the solution is suitably buffered if necessary and the liquid diluent first rendered isotonic with sufficient saline or glucose. These particular aqueous solutions are especially suitable for intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous and intraperitoneal administration. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily optimize effective dosages and administration regimens as determined by good medical practice and the clinical condition of the individual patient.

The frequency of dosing will depend on the pharmacokinetic parameters of the compounds and the routes of administration. The optimal pharmaceutical formulation will be determined by one of skill in the art depending on the route of administration and the desired dosage. Such formulations may influence the physical state, stability, rate of in vivo release and rate of in vivo clearance of the administered agents. Depending on the route of administration, a suitable dose is calculated according to body weight, body surface areas or organ size. The availability of animal models is particularly useful in facilitating a determination of appropriate dosages of a given therapeutic. Further refinement of the calculations necessary to determine the appropriate treatment dose is routinely made by those of ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation, especially in light of the dosage information and assays disclosed herein as well as the pharmacokinetic data observed in animals or human clinical trials.

Typically, appropriate dosages are ascertained through the use of established assays for determining blood levels in conjunction with relevant dose response data. The final dosage regimen will be determined by the attending physician, considering factors which modify the action of drugs, e.g., the drug's specific activity, severity of the damage and the responsiveness of the patient, the age, condition, body weight, sex and diet of the patient, the severity of any infection, time of administration and other clinical factors. As studies are conducted, further information will emerge regarding appropriate dosage levels and duration of treatment for specific diseases and conditions. Those studies, however, are routine and within the level of skilled persons in the art.

It will be appreciated that the pharmaceutical compositions and treatment methods of the invention are useful in fields of human medicine and veterinary medicine. Thus, the subject to be treated is a mammal, such as a human or other mammalian animal. For veterinary purposes, subjects include for example, farm animals including cows, sheep, pigs, horses and goats, companion animals such as dogs and cats, exotic and/or zoo animals, and laboratory animals including mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and hamsters.

In another embodiment, the present invention also provides antibodies for binding the compounds of the present invention which have MMP13 inhibitory activity. The antibodies can be generated using the compounds of the present invention as antigens in various methods known in the art. For example, the methods of U.S. Pat. No. 7,049,410, which is incorporated herein by reference, to make monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies can be used to make the antibodies against the compounds of the present invention. For example, a peptide having the amino acid sequence ELGLPKEVKKISAAVHFED (amino acids 93-111 of SEQ ID NO: 1, variously referred to as MPP13-19, pxpt 001-1, the “inhibitory peptide,” or the “peptide”) can be used as an antigen to generate monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies to MMP13. The antibodies are useful as diagnostics, e.g. in detecting the specific peptides or polypeptides of the present invention or MMP13, or determining the presence or absence of the peptides or polypeptides in the body tissues. One skilled in the art would be able to utilize the antibodies in accordance with known diagnostic methods. In an embodiment, the antibodies may be labeled for easy detection. The labels can be, but are not limited to biotin, fluorescent molecules, radioactive molecules, chromogenic substrates, chemi-luminescence, and enzymes.

Without further description, it is believed that one of ordinary skill in the art can, using the preceding description and the following illustrative examples, make and utilize the compounds and methods of the present invention. The following examples are given to illustrate the present invention. It should be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific conditions or details described in those examples.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Materials and Methods

Cartilage extract preparation, immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis—Tibia from normal Sprague-Dawley 14 day old newborn rat pups or day 19 chick embryos were dissected free of tissue and the tibial growth plates isolated by microdissection. The cartilage was minced and extracted overnight in 0.5% 3-([3-chlomadipropyl]dimethylammonio)-1-propane-sulfonate (CHAPS) buffer [10 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.6] (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA). Avian tissue was immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti human LTBP-1 (a kind gift of Dr. Kohei Miyazono), rabbit anti avian MMP-13 (D'Angelo, et al., 2000) or rabbit pre-immune serum (Pierce Biochemicals, Rockford, Ill., USA). Rat tissue was immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti human LTBP-1 or rabbit anti human TGβ2 polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif., USA). Concurrently, TGFβ antibody was biotinylated using the EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotinylation Kit according to protocol (Pierce Biochemicals, Rockford, Ill., USA). Conditioned media from day 5 chondrocyte alginate cultures was incubated with biotin-labeled. TGFβ antibody for 30 minutes at room temperature and passed over a μMACS strep-avidin micro-bead column (Miltenyi Biotec, Inc, Auburn, Calif., USA). All immunoprecipitates were separated on 4-20% or 8-16% Tris-glycine, SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels, (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif., USA). Proteins were transferred to Protran nitrocellulose (Schleicher and Schull, Keene, N.H., USA) in a Bio-Rad Mini-blot transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, Calif., USA), blocked for 2 hours at room temperature with 3% (wt/vol) nonfat milk in tris-buffered saline (TBS/Tween; 10 mM Trizma base (pH 8.0) and 150 mM sodium chloride and 0.05% Tween-20), and incubated in TBS/Tween containing 1% nonfat milk and primary antibody raised against TGFβ2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc:, Santa Cruz, Calif., USA) or primary antibody raised against avian MMP-13 (D'Angelo, et al., J. Cell. Biochem. 77:678-693, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference). Immunoblots were then exposed to horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody in TBS/Tween (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif., USA) and bands of immunoreactivity were visualized with the Western Blotting Luminol Reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif., USA) and exposed to Kodak X-Omat Blue XB-1 film (Kodak, Rochester, N.Y., USA). CM and CAM samples were concentrated 5-10 fold by centrifugation in Centricon concentrators (molecular weight (MW) cut-off=10 kDa), (Pierce Biochemicals, Rockford, Ill., USA). Total protein was determined by the modified Lowry method (Pierce Biochemicals, Rockford, Ill., USA). 8-16% Tris-glycine, SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif., USA) were loaded with 20 g total protein per lane in Laemelli's reducing sample buffer and 8M urea. Immunoblot analysis was conducted with primary antibody raised against avian collagen type X (Pacifici et al., Exp. Cell Res. 192:266-270, 1991, which is incorporated herein by reference). The main band of collagen type X protein was scanned and analyzed with the Phase III Image Pro analyzer software (Phase III, Malvern, Pa., USA).

Serum-free Alginate Cultures—Chondrocytes were reared in serum-free alginate culture as previously described (D'Angelo et al., J. Bone Miner. Res. 16:2339-2347, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference) Briefly, hypertrophic chondrocytes were isolated from day 17 avian embryonic cephalic sternal core (following 5 days in culture they are designated late hypertrophic (LH)) and cephalic sternal periphery (following 5 days in culture they are designated early hypertrophic (EH)) (D'Angelo et al., J. Bone Miner. Res. 12:1368-1377, 1997; and D'Angelo et al., 2001, which are incorporated herein by reference). The tissue was enzymatically digested in 0.25% trypsin and 0.1% crude collagenase and plated at final density of 5×106 cells/ml in 1.2% Keltone LVCR alginate (Kelco Clark, N.J., USA) or plated at 2×106 cells/35 mm well for high-density monolayer cultures. Complete Serum-free Media (DMEM-high glucose, 1 mM cysteine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine) (Invitrogen Corporation) was added to the alginate cultures. Media was changed and collected every 48 hrs with 30 μg/ml ascorbate added on day 2 of culture. Conditioned media was pooled from alginate cultures on day 5, the cells isolated by incubation with 55 mM sodium citrate and the supernatant designated as cell-associated matrix. Pelleted cells were extracted with 0.5% CHAPS detergent buffer [10 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.6) and designated cell layer fraction (Sigma Biochemicals). Conditioned media and cell-associated matrix samples were concentrated four-fold in Centricon-10 filters (MW cut-off 10,000 Daltons) as per manufacturer's instructions (Fisher Scientific).

Reverse-transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction—Cells were isolated from alginate culture following incubation in 0.5M EDTA, pH 8.0, then 5×106 cells resuspended per ml of Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Corporation) and total RNA isolated as per manufacturer's instructions. Reverse-transcribed cDNA was prepared with Superscript enzyme according to manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen Corporation) and subjected to amplification using Ready-to-go PCR beads per manufacturer's instructions (GE Healthcare). The following primers were designed from the NCBI database: avian 18srRNA Forward 5′-TTA ACG AGG ATC CAT TGG AG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 21) Reverse 5′-AGC CTG CTT TGA ACA CTC TA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 22); avian collagen type X Forward 5′-AGA GGA GTA CTC CTG AAA GT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 23) Reverse 5′-ACT GCT GAA CAT AAG CTC CT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 24); human LTBP-1short Forward 5′-CCG CAT CAA GGT GGT CTT TA 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 25) Reverse 5′-CAT ACA CTC ACC ATT AGG GC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 26); human LTBP-1long Forward 5′-TGT GGA GGG CAG TGC TGC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 27) Reverse 5′-TAA AGA CCA CCT TGA TGC GG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 28); avian MMP-13 Forward 5′-TAC TGC TGA TAT CAT GAT CTC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 29) Reverse 5′-TCT AGA ATC ATC TGA CCA AGT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 30); avian TGFβ2 Forward 5′-AAT GAC AGC ATC AGG TAC GG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 31) Reverse 5′-ATG GTC AGG ACT GAG GCA C-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 32); and avian caspase-3 Forward 5′-AGA TGT ATC AGA TGC AAG ATC T-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 33) Reverse 5′-GAA GTC TGC TTC TAC AGG TAT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 34). PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gels, densitometrically scanned (Gel-Pro Analyzer, Media Cybernetics, Silver Springs, Md., USA), and normalized to 18srRNA as an internal standard. Densitometric values for a minimum of n=3 were plotted using Prism GraphPad software version 3.03 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif., USA) with ANOVA and 95% C.I. Tukey's analysis.

Immunoblot Analysis—Immunoblot analysis was performed on the conditioned media (soluble fraction), cell-associated matrix fraction (territorial matrix) and the CHAPS buffer extract (cell layer). 20 μg total protein was loaded per well, electrophoretically separated on precast 8-16% gradient Tris-glycine SDS polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen Corporation), transferred to nitrocellulose, and incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-TGFβ2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), rabbit polyclonal anti-MMP-13 (D'Angelo et al., 2000), and rabbit polyclonal anti-LTBP-1 (kind gift from K. Miyazono) followed by incubation with horse-radish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Reactive bands were visualized through chemiluminescence and exposed film densitometrically scanned (Gel-Pro Analyzer, Media Cybernetics, Silver Springs, Md., USA).

Immunocytochemistry—Chondrocytes were isolated and plated 2×106 cells per 35 mm well onto 22×22 mm glass coverslips (VWR) and fed with Complete Media containing 10% NuSerum (Fisher Scientific). Cultures were incubated up to 48 hours until confluent, in the presence of 40 ng hyaluronidase per milliliter complete media. Cells were fixed in CytoFix/CytoPerm (BD Biosciences) per manufacturer's instructions and cell-free extracellular matrix samples were produced by lysing chondrocytes with cold phosphate buffered saline and 10% Triton X-100 as described (Dallas et al., J. Cell Biol. 131:539-549, 1995, which is incorporated herein by reference). Cells and extracellular matrix were incubated with primary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology): 100 mg/ml IgG TGFβ2 (V), 20 μg/ml IgG MMP-13 (E-20), and 20 μg/ml IgG LTBP-1 (N-20) followed by secondary antibodies: 1 ng/ml goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 rhodamine in the case of TGFB and MMP-13 or 1 ng/ml donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 488 fluoroscene in the case of LTBP-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Nuclei were counterstained with 1 μg/ml Hoechst dye (Sigma-Aldrich), fluorescent images were captured with Nikon E600 fluorescent microscope (Nikon Inc., Melville, N.Y., USA) at 100× objective, and z-stacks acquired with ImagePro 4.5 (Media Cybernetics, Silver Springs, Md., USA) then deconvoluted with AutoDeblur AutoVisualize version 9.2.1 software (AutoQuant Imaging Inc., Watervliet, N.Y., USA).

Results

A novel TGFβ large latent complex produced by hypertrophic chondrocytes contains MMP-13—Early and late hypertrophic chondrocytes produce activated TGFβ and another hypertrophy-specific marker, the metalloprotease, MMP-13, has a role in the activation of TGFβ by hypertrophic chondrocytes (D'Angelo et al., 2001). Immunoblot analysis of conditioned media from early and late hypertrophic chondrocyte alginate cultures revealed that antibody to MMP-13 cross-reacted with a 280-300 kDa, putative TGF-β2 LLC complex (data not shown). To elaborate this observation, we prepared extracts from day 19 avian tibial hypertrophic chondrocytes, immunoprecipitated proteins with MMP-13 or LTBP-1 antibody and then subjected the immunoprecipitates to immunoblot analysis with TGFβ2 (FIG. 2A). TGFβ-immunoreactive bands were detected at approximately 290 kD, that is the putative large latent TGFβ complex produced by hypertrophic chondrocytes, 60 kD representing the N-terminal β-LAP fragment of TGFβ2 and 25 kD representing the homodimer of activated TGFβ2 whether immunoprecipitated with αLTBP-1 or αMMP-13 antibody (FIG. 2A). Rat tibial growth plate cartilage extracts immunoprecipitated with antibody to TGFβ2 contained MMP-13 immunoreactive bands at approximately 130 kDa representing the soluble form of the TGF-β large latent complex and 68 kDa and 52 kDa representing the proenzyme and activated enzyme forms of MMP-13 (FIG. 2B). Conditioned media from late hypertrophic chondrocyte alginate cultures were immunoprecipitated with biotin-labeled polyclonal antibody to TGFβ and immunoblotted with αMMP13 revealing an approximate 52 kDa immunoreactive band (FIG. 2C). These data indicate the production of a unique TGF-β LLC produced by mammalian and avian hypertrophic chondrocytes that includes MMP-13 in non-covalent association.

MMP-13 associates with hypertrophic chondrocyte produced TGF-β LLC—Total messenger RNA was examined in the alginate cultures to confirm that both populations of cells were hypertrophic (FIG. 3A). Indeed, expression of collagen type X mRNA and MMP-13 mRNA, markers of hypertrophy; was observed at high levels in both early and late hypertrophic chondrocytes (EH and LH, respectively) even though they had not progressed to terminal differentiation as evidenced by low levels of mRNA expression for caspase-3, an apoptotic marker (FIG. 3A). Both populations expressed message for LTBP-1 and TGFβ, components of the TGF-β LLC (FIG. 3B). It has been shown by other laboratories that LTBP-1 can be alternatively spliced to create a long form that maintains a complete N-terminus, or a short from that possesses a truncated N-terminus thought to be more easily removed from the extracellular matrix. We designed primers to differentiate between both forms of LTBP-1 and demonstrated that hypertrophic chondrocytes produce both the long and short forms of LTBP-1 (FIG. 3B) with late hypertrophic chondrocytes producing five-fold more of the short form of LTBP-1 than early hypertrophic chondrocytes.

We conducted immunoblot analysis on day 5 alginate chondrocyte cultures to ascertain what forms of the TGF-β LLC are produced and secreted. Protein components of the TGF-β LLC were identified either in the soluble conditioned media fraction (soluble) or the incorporated proteins of the extracellular matrix fraction (territorial matrix) or the proteins associated with the CHAPS-extracted cell pellet (cell layer) (FIG. 4). Reduced immunoblot analysis utilizing antibodies to TGF-β2 (FIG. 4A), MMP-13 (FIG. 4B), and LTBP-1 (FIG. 4C) revealed the presence of these proteins in all three fractions examined. Late hypertrophic chonchocytes, overall, produced more of the three proteins than did early hypertrophic chondrocytes. TGFβ antibody cross-reacted with bands at approximately 240 kDa, the TGF-β LLC, 130-190 kDa, the putative soluble species of the TGF-β LLC, 100 kDa, the TGF-β small latent complex, 60 kDa, the putative β-LAP, and 25 kDa, the TGFβ bioactive homodimer (FIG. 4A). The majority of detectable protein was present in the soluble and cell layer fractions indicating hypertrophic chondrocyte production and secretion of the TGF-β large and small latent complexes. In addition, late hypertrophic chondrocyte samples produced more TGFβ immunoreactive protein per total protein than did early hypertrophic chondrocytes (FIG. 4A, EH versus LH).

MMP-13 immunoblot analysis revealed an approximate 64 kDa band, the MMP-13 proenzyme and a 52 kDa band representing the active MMP-13 enzyme (FIG. 4B). In addition, a less intense immunoreactive band was visible at 130-190 kDa, representing the putative soluble species of TGF-β LLC and a detectable band at approximately 240 kDa representing the TGF-β LLC (FIG. 4B). LTBP-1 immunoblot revealed an 80 kDa band of LTBP-1 and a less intensely stained band of 240 kDa, the TGF-β LLC (FIG. 4C). The presence of a 130-190 kDa band in the soluble layer indicates production of the soluble species of the TGF-β LLC. In the LTBP-1 immunoblots, bands were detectable in the territorial matrix, as well as the secreted and cell layer fractions, indicating incorporation of LTBP-1 into the extracellular matrix produced by hypertrophic chondrocytes. Taken together, the immunoblot data suggest association of MMP-13 with the TGF-β LLC.

Extracellular immunolocalization of the hypertrophic chondrocyte produced TGF-β LLC—Preparation of cell-free matrices from high-density plating of late hypertrophic chondrocytes was confirmed by collagen type X staining (FIG. 5). Cell-free extracellular matrices exhibited strong collagen type X labeling (FIG. 5A) compared to secondary antibody control (FIG. 5C) and cell cytoplasm stained intensely for collagen type X (FIG. 5B, arrow). Cytoplasmic and extracellular staining of collagen type X was confirmed by three-dimensional z-stack construction: two-dimensional slices were taken at stepped focal planes within the cell and then compiled to yield three-dimensional representations that can be rotated around an axis (FIG. 5D).

TGFβ2, MMP-13, and LTBP-1 were all present in high-density monolayers of late hypertrophic chondrocytes. All three proteins were observed within the extracellular matrix (FIG. 6A-C, arrows) and cytoplasm of the hypertrophic chondrocytes. Rotating three-dimensional z-stacks confirmed immunolocalization of all three proteins in the cytoplasm of the late hypertrophic chondrocytes, and extracellular matrix staining was detectable in the images after background subtraction. Marked extracellular matrix staining of LTBP-1 was evident, whereas, MMP-13 staining was more punctate and TGFβ staining more diffuse in the extracellular matrix (FIG. 6D-F).

Co-localization of MMP-13 and LTBP-1 in the hypertrophic chondrocyte-produced TGF-β LLC -Previous bioinformatics work from our laboratory indicated a plausible interaction of the hernopexin domains of MMP-13 with the calcium-EGF-like domains of LTBP-1 (Selim et al., J Bone Miner. Res. 20:S131, 2005; and Mattioli et al., J. Bone Miner. Res. 19:S216, 2004, which are incorporated herein by reference). To confirm this hypothesized interaction, we utilized immunocytochemical staining methods to co-localize MMP-13 and LTBP-1. Composite image overlay of MMP-13 and LTBP-1 staining confirmed co-localization of the two proteins observed as yellow-orange staining (FIG. 7C1-7C3). The overlay indicates that the proteins of interest are within close proximity and that staining is within the cytoplasm (FIG. 7C1, arrow) and within the extracellular matrix (FIG. 7C3, arrow). Rotated three-dimensional z-stacks confirmed co-localization of MMP-13 and LTBP-1 as evidence by most robust yellow to orange staining within the cytoplasm and extracellular matrix (FIG. 7D).

The data presented in this study support a mechanism for hypertrophic chondrocyte activation of the TGFβ LLC (FIG. 1). In this model, MMP-13 produced by hypertrophic chondrocytes interacts with the LTBP-1 portion of the TGF-β LLC. Once non-covalently associated with the TGF-β, LLC, MMP-13 cleaves the LTBP-1 protease-sensitive hinge region and release the soluble 130-190 kDa TGFβ LLC. This soluble form of TGFβ LLC would be more susceptible to proteolytic release of the TGFβ SLC and subsequent activation of the TGFβ homodimeric form. Even though the antibodies utilized in our immunocytochemical studies do not differentiate between the 130-190 kDa soluble species of the TGF-β LLC and the full length TGF-β LLC, we expect that MMP-13 cleavage of the protease-sensitive hinge region of LTBP-1 could occur both in the extracellular matrix (most likely site) and within the cell cytoplasm. Because our model includes a non-covalent interaction between LTBP-1 and MMP-13, the driving force for the formation of the unique TGFβ LLC would be concentrations of the molecules MMP13 and TGF-β LLC within close proximity to one another.

Example 2 Materials and Methods

Avian chondrocyte isolation and serum free cell culture—Sterna were removed from day 17 chick embryos using microsurgical techniques as previously described (D'Angelo et al., J. Bone Miner. Res. 12:1368-1377, 1997). Cells were released by digestion of the extracellular matrix in 0.25% trypsin and 0.1% crude collagenase mixture (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA) in Hanks' buffered saline solution for 3-4 hours at 37° C. Digestion was halted by suspension in high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif., USA). The cell suspensions were then filtered through a 0.2 μm filter, counted, seeded onto Falcon 6-well, tissue culture treated plates and covered with 2 ml of high glucose DMEM containing 10% NuSerum and 50 μg/ml of penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM of L-glutamine (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif., USA). After 48 hours the cells were rinsed and processed for binding studies as described below.

Peptide binding assay—Twenty-five micrograms of total equal protein from cartilage CHAPS extracts or five nanograms recombinant protein of the calcium-like EGF binding domain of LTBP1 (a kind gift of Sarah Dallas) or hypertrophic cartilage from day 17 avian embryo sterna and tibial growth plate cartilage from day 14 newborn rat pups were extracted with 0.5% CHAPS buffer and eluates immunoprecipitated with polyclonal antibody to LTBP1 and then samples were plated onto poly-L-lysine coated 96 well plates. After overnight drying, the protein-coated wells were incubated with 100 nM fluorescent-labeled peptide in Tris buffered saline [150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0] and 20% horse serum for 4 hours at 16° C.

After incubation, the wells are washed twice with binding buffer, the protein layer solubilized with 5N NaOH and fluorescence bound measured at 495 nm excitation and 520 nm emission on the LabSystems Fluoroskan Ascent CF plate reader. Statistical analyses and graphing were performed with Prism GraphPad software (ANOVA with Turkey's Analysis). A scrambled peptide of the same amino acid composition was prepared as a negative control. Competition assays were conducted in the presence of 10-fold more (1 μM) naked peptide.

Bioinformatics analysis—Amino acid sequences of proteins analyzed in the manuscript were obtained from Swiss-Prot data base (www.ebi.ac.uk/swissprot/). Pfam data base (www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/) was used for protein domain analysis. Pfam-A is based on hidden Markox model (HMM) searches, as provided by the HMMER2 package (hmmer.janelia.org/). In HMMER2, like BLAST, E-values (expectation values) are calculated. The E-value is the number of hits that would be expected to have a score equal or better than this by chance alone. A good E-value is much smaller than 1 because 1 is what is expected that sequences are similar by chance. In principle, the significance of a match is predicated on a low E-value. 3D models were generated using I-TASSER database (zhang.bioinformatics.ku.edu/I-TASSER/). Protein docking models were generated using Vakser lab database (www.vakser.bioinformatics.ku.edu/resources/gramm/grammx/). Protein-protein interface prediction data was generated using PIP-Pred database (bioinformatics.leeds.ac.uk/ppi_pred/index.html). Images were generated using Jmol software (jmol.sourceforge.net/).

Results

Model of the novel TGFβ large latent complex produced by hypertrophic chondrocytes—To examine the nature of interaction between MMP13 and LTBP1, we analyzed their structural domains. MMP13 has a peptidase-like domain (P) and three hemopexin-like domains (H) (Table 1 and FIG. 8A).

TABLE 1 Sequence ^(a)E-Value Domain MMP13 (avian) Peptidase (P)  19-174  8.2e−104 Hemopexin (H) 197-239 6.9e−12 241-284 3.5e−10 289-336 2.5e−14 LTBP1 short (human) Cysteine-rich (C) 687-728 4.4e−23 1358-1401 9.4e−20 ^(b)1535-1577  2.1e−20 EGF-like (E) 191-218 0.00024 403-430 3.7e−6  1626-1661 8.6e−5  Calcium-binding EGF-like 626-665 2.7e−9  (CE) 916-956 2.7e−14 958-997 8.6e−14  999-1037 3.9e−10 1039-1078  2e−9 1080-1119  1e−10 1121-1160 3.9e−10 1162-1201 6.3e−14 1203-1243 1.2e−11 1245-1285 4.6e−11 1249-1285 1.6e−8  1287-1328 0.00033 1425-1466 0.0003  1468-1507 0.00012 1663-1706 3.2e−9  ^(a)The expectation values (E-value) of the homology of the regions of these molecules was determined as described in the Materials and Methods section. The lower the E-value the more likely the sequence is a specific match. ^(b)Known sequence for the cysteine-rich area Where the TGFβ small latent complex covalently binds to LTBP1

The hemopexin-like domain is important for substrate specificity. It also facilitates binding to a variety of molecules and proteins, for example the hemopexin repeats of some matrixins bind tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases (TIMPs). LBTP1 is a larger molecule that consists of several domains: EGF-like domain (E), calcium-binding EGF-like domain (CE) and cysteine rich (the TGFβ small latent complex binding) domain (C) (Table 1 and FIG. 8A). The role of the calcium-binding EGF-like domain varies, depending on the function of the parent molecule, but it appears to be primarily involved in inter-domain interactions between some proteins. In addition, LBTP1 has a linker region that is sensitive to proteolytic cleavage.

The data suggests a model in which the hemopexin domain of MMP13 interacts with calcium-binding EGF-like domain of LBTP1 short in an orientation that places the peptidase domain of MMP13 at very close proximity to the linker region of LBTP1 short (FIG. 8B). This puts MMP13 in the correct conformation to line up the highly conserved sequence (HEXGHXXGXXHS/T; SEQ ID NOs: 152 and 153) the catalytic domain of MMP13 (FIG. 8B, P) with the protease-sensitive hinge region of LTBP1 short (FIG. 8B, Linker region). This is the site thought to be the target for release of LTBP1 from the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, this orientation is supported by presence of candidate amino acids in this region of LTBP1 short, Gly-Ile bonds at positions 807/808 and 819/820, that are known to interact with the peptidase domain of MMP13.

As a result of these predictions, we embarked on a bioinformatics study to determine the potential interaction between MMP13 and LTBP 1. The potential interaction of MMP13 hemopexin domains with the EGF-like calcium binding domains of LTBP1 was indicated by a protein database file generated by the protein docking program Vakser lab. Modeling with a protein-protein docking program resulted in a three-dimensional model that corroborates the MMP13 molecule interaction with LTBP1 (FIGS. 8A and B) and the site of interaction is toward the N-terminus, not the C terminal site of TGFβ linkage to LTBP1 (FIG. 8B). Binding motifs analysis within the MMP13-LTBP1 complex demonstrated a high affinity interfacing area within the catalytic domain and moderate affinity interfacing area within hemopexin like domains (FIG. 8C). In order to demonstrate these predicted interactions, we designed three candidate peptides from the hemopexin domain of MMP13 that could potentially interact non-covalently with the CE region of LTBP 1.

Peptides designed to MMPI3 hemopexin domain specifically bind LTBP1 proteins—We conducted binding studies with avian cartilage tissue extracts from the resting and hypertrophic zones of the cartilage growth plate. Both tissues produce TGFβ and store it in the extracellular matrix in the form of the LTBP1-containing TGFβ large latent complex. However, hypertrophic cartilage tissue produces more TGFβ, a larger percentage of which is activated, than that stored in the resting cartilage. In addition, only hypertrophic chondrocytes produce MMP13, thus offering us a model to compare different chondrocyte-produced cartilage tissue and its subsequent binding to MMP13-derived peptides.

MMP13-19 peptide (amino acids 93-111 of SEQ ID NO: 1) bound to the hypertrophic cartilage tissue extract approximately nine-fold more than scrambled peptide control, as compared to a five-fold binding of resting cartilage tissue (FIGS. 9B and A, respectively). MMP13-10 peptide (amino acids 17-26 of SEQ ID NO: 1) bound less than two-fold the scrambled peptide whether it was the resting or hypertrophic cartilage tissue (FIG. 9C) and MMP13-6 peptide (amino acids 37-42 of SEQ ID NO: 1) did not specifically bind either cartilage tissue (FIG. 9D). All binding was competed with 10-fold excess non-fluorescent peptide.

To determine binding of the peptides to LTBP1 in its native conformation, hypertrophic chondrocytes were plated in monolayer to produce a native extracellular matrix. MMP13-19 and MMP13-10 peptides bound to the extracellular matrix of whole cell primary chondrocyte cultures eight-fold and four-fold, respectively, compared to scrambled peptide (FIG. 10A). Again, MMP13-6 did not bind specifically (data not shown).

Since total cell extracts and whole cell cultures contain more proteins than just LTBP1, we conducted binding studies on cartilage tissue samples immunoprecipitated with antibody to LTBP1. MMP13-19 peptide bound 10.5-fold more than scrambled control in the hypertrophic cartilage immunoprecipitates (FIG. 10B). Binding with rat tibial growth plate cartilage immunoprecipitated extracts was 3.9-fold higher than scrambled control (FIG. 10B) demonstrating a global interaction and not a species-specific binding between LTBP1 and the MMP-13 derived peptide.

To determine whether binding is occurring at the calcium-binding EGF-like domains of LTBP predicted by our bioinformatics model, we conducted binding studies with a recombinant protein designed from this region (CE-LTBP1). In these studies, MMP13-19 peptide bound 27-fold more recombinant protein than the scrambled peptide, whereas MMP13-10 and MMP13-6 did not bind specifically (FIG. 10C).

Example 3

To measure the ability of MMP13-19 peptide to bind endogenous large latent complex of TGFβ and interfere with the activation of this growth factor, hypertrophic chondrocytes were cultured in alginate beads in serum-free medium for 24 hours with varying concentrations of MMP13-19 peptide. Conditioned media was then subjected to an ELISA to measure total TGFβ produced and the percentage of endogenously activated TGFβ (FIG. 11). All three doses (10, 100, and 750 nM) of MMP13-19 peptide resulted in a statistically significant decrease in endogenously activated TGFβ although the total amount of TGFβ produced was not affected. These data indicate that the MMP13-19 peptide can be used as an inhibitor of TGFβ activation.

Example 4

Animals were treated with MMP13-19 peptide or BMP-7 protein once a week for two (d14) or three (d21) weeks following an injection of mono-iodoacetate (MIA), a chemical agent that induces osteoarthritis pathology measurable at four weeks post injection. The samples that received saline are the positive disease control. 250 nM of MMP13-19 peptide and 50 uM BMP-7 were injected laterally below the patellar ligament. BMP-7 has been shown to be chondroprotective in a similar model of OA. But, it is also known that BMP-7 is bone-inducing. The data are shown in Tables 2-3 below.

TABLE 2 Total Volume Bone Volume BV/TV Patellar cartilage d 14 OA saline 8.0451 0.1486 0.0185 OA MMP13-19 peptide 9.1804 0.1247 0.0136 OA BMP-7 6.6967 0.419 0.0626 Patellar cartilage d 21 OA saline 6.0544 0.3204 0.0529 OA MMP13-19 peptide 7.7109 0.1912 0.0248 OA BMP-7 10.7748 0.2037 0.0192

TABLE 3 Total Volume Bone Volume BV/TV Total Joint Cartilage d 14 OA saline 24.9735 0.5067 0.0243 OA MMP13-19 peptide 22.2703 0.6334 0.0284 OA BMP-7 24.4891 1.0643 0.0435 Total Joint Cartilage d 21 OA saline 24.5334 1.3883 0.0566 OA MMP13-19 peptide 24.367 0.6164 0.0253 OA BMP-7 23.3101 0.9607 0.0412

NOTE: A lower value for Bone Volume or Total Volume or a lower BV/TV ratio indicates cartilage that is NOT mineralized.

The amount of bone volume present in the samples indicates the areas of mineralization. Since cartilage is not normally mineralized, one would expect a low bone volume in these samples. In OA, cartilage will begin to mineralize. Of the conditions tested in this preliminary study, MMP13-19 peptide was the most effective at maintaining a normal range of cartilage with the lowest bone volume at each time point. This indicates a chondroprotective function for the MMP13-19 peptide that is even better than the known effects of BMP-7.

Example 5 Peptide Interaction with Collagen

Bioinformatics may be used to identify candidate fragments that can interact with substrates. For example, a three-dimensional model of dog MMP13 was generated. The dog MMP13 3D structure was docked with the 3D structure of substrate (such as type II collagen). The 3D structure of the complex was generated and then analyzed to identify interfacing residues in MMP13 and substrate (such as type II collagen). Peptides designed based on the interfacing residues (derived from MMP13 or the substrate) could be used to modify the interaction between MMP13 and its substrates. Preferably, the fragment contains at least 10 amino acids, more preferably 10 to 40 amino acids,

Dog MMP13 amino acid sequence was obtained from UniProt database (dog sequences may be found at SEQ ID NOs:124-150). The chain was used to generate three dimensional (3D) model of dog MMP13 (FIG. 13). The 3D structure is showing the typical known structure of MMPs with collagenase domain toward the N-terminus. This is the first time to model dog MMP13. Collagen is a known substrate for different collagenases. The 3D structures of MMP13 and collagen triple helix complex (FIG. 14) was generated using protein docking servers. The complex demonstrated sandwich-like structure where collagen is lying within a groove within MMP13 (FIG.15). The complex was visualized and interacting residues were identified. Peptide-based compound was designed and modeled (FIG. 16). To test the ability of the peptide to interfere with MMP13-collagen interaction, we docked MMP13, collagen and peptide together in one complex (FIG. 17). Complex modeling demonstrated that MMP13 derived peptide is interrupting the MMP13-collagenase interaction by interfering with the sandwich orientation (FIGS. 16 and 17). Sequences used for these figures, and other dog sequences are given in SEQ ID NOs: 124

These data suggested that such peptide has a potential competitive inhibitory effect on MMP13-collagen interaction. 124-151.

Example 6 Peptide Interaction with Aggrecan Molecule

Aggrecan is a known substrate for MMP13. Aggrecan is a major component of cartilage matrix. The peptide was docked with aggrecan (FIG. 18). Complex energy was −0.6 and two hydrogen bonds are predicted in the complex.

Example 7 Peptide Interaction with Fibronectin

Fibronectin is another known substrate for MMP13. The peptide was docked with fibronectin III (FIG. 19). Complex energy was −6.9 and three hydrogen bonds are predicted (FIG. 19).

Example 8 MMP13 Cleavage of LTBP1

Since TGFβ activation can be altered by competitive inhibition of the endogenous MMP13, then MMP13 should be able to utilize the protease-sensitive hinge region of LTBP1 as a substrate as indicated by our working model (FIG. 1). In order to test this, we utilized a fluorescence labeled peptide of the published protease-sensitive hinge region for LTBP1, REHGARS (Taipale, J; Miyazono, K; Heldin, C-H and J. Keski-Oja (1994) JCB 124, 171-181). Enzyme kinetic assays with a commercially available MMP13 catalytic domain (Enzo, Inc) were conducted with our hinge region peptide substrate. Michaelis-Menten non-linear fit for the MMP13 digest of the hinge substrate demonstrates a Km=1.628e-016 (FIG. 21A). When this activity is compared with a peptide substrate of scrambled sequence, the two lines have statistically significant differences in slopes (p<0.03419) (FIG. 21B). These data indicate that MMP13 can utilize the protease-sensitive hinge region of LTBP1 as a substrate. Thus, our modeled interaction of MMP13 with the TGFβ large latent complex could be a method of release of TGFβ from extracellular matrix stores.

Utilizing a standard curve with MMP13 and MMP9 catalytic domains (Enzo, Inc) we quantitated the amount of MMP13 and MMP9 activity in cartilage extracts (Table 4). Cartilage isolated from day 17 avian embryos contain 0.166 units and 0.152 units MMP13 per 40 μg total tissue in early hypertrophic and late hypertrophic tissue, respectively. As expected, resting cartilage does not contain measurable quantities of MMP13 activity. Inclusion of an inhibitor of MMP13 (Calbiochem) reduces the activity in both cartilage populations by 24% and 30% respectively.

All of the cartilage extracts contain enzymatic activity that can digest the hinge substrate (FIG. 22). MMP13 catalytic domain and resting, early and late hypertrophic cartilage all contain enzymatic activity that is statistically significant when compared to the scrambled substrate (FIG. 22A). The amount of activity in the cartilage extracts is significantly higher than the MMP13 catalytic domain alone (FIG. 22B) indicating that agents other than MMP13 are responsible for these data. This is further supported by the statistically significant activity present in resting cartilage, a tissue that does not contain MMP13 activity (see Table 4).

TABLE 4 MMP13 Enzymatic Activity in Cartilage Extracts. *Units MMP13 MMP13 MMP13/9 Sample ID Activity Inhibitor Inhibitor Resting chondrocytes 0 Early Hypertrophic 0.166 −23.68% −20.39% Late Hypertophic 0.152 −29.50% −27.50%

Table 4: CHAPS extracts of avian sterna cartilage were prepared from day 17 embryos. After dialysis with PBS, 20 ug total protein was assayed with MMP13 substrate (Enzo Laboratories). An MMP13 catalytic domain standard curve was prepared. Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics activity was calculated and units of enzyme activity interpolated from the MMP13 catalytic domain standard curve. Inhibitors of MMP13 and MMP13/9 activity were included in the assay (Calbiochem). n>3 separate extractions was tested. All statistics were calculated with Prism GraphPad software. * 40 μg total protein

Example 9 Chronic OA Pathology in the Articular Cartilage of the Tibial-Femoral Joint Space

Rats were injected below the patella with mono-iodoacetate to induce OA pathology. One week following the initial insult, rats were injected with saline (Control OA) or 250 nM pxtx001-1 peptide (Peptide treated SEQ ID 36 (FIG. 22A) every other week out to 12 weeks. Rats were sacrificed and joints collected, dissected free of tissue, fixed in formalin, decalcified, paraffin-embedded, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or saffranin O (for total proteoglycan content). Grading was assessed by the OARSI (Pritzker, K. P., Gay, S., Jimenez, S. A., Ostergaard, K., Pelletier, J. P., Revell, P. A., Salter, D., and van den Berg, W. B. (2006) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14, 13-29) scale for pathology. FIG. 23 shows histopathology results of the present experiment comparing normal (top), control (middle), and peptide inhibitor treated (bottom) stained with both safranin-O (right), and hematoxaylin+eosin (left). Histologically, the peptide treated joints have a lower grading on the OA scale than the untreated joints as evidenced by proteoglycan content and abnormal chondrocyte morphology.

Example 10 Acute Treatment of Osteoarthritis Modelwith High and Low Dose Peptide Inhibitor

We have utilized an experimental rat model of OA by injection of mono-iodoacetate (MIA) through the infrapatellar ligament of 150 g, male, Wistar rats. This model is characterized by osteophyte formation at the joint edges, fibrillation and erosion of the cartilage and sclerosis of the subchondral bone within 30 days of the injection (Janusz, M. J., Hookfin, E. B., Heitmeyer, S. A. et al. (2001) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9, 751-760, and Guingamp, C., Gegout-Pottie, P., Philippe, L., Terlain, B., Netter, P., and Gillet, P. (1997) Arthritis Rheum. 40, 1670-1679). We analyzed joint cartilage pathology in the MIA-induced OA model following injection of candidate peptides.

MIA (3 mg in 50 ul) was injected into the capsule of the stifle through the infrapatellar ligament of the right knee (Janusz, M. J., Hookfin, E. B., Heitmeyer, S. A. et al. (2001) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9, 751-760, and Guingamp, C., Gegout-Pottie, P., Philippe, L., Terlain, B., Netter, P., and Gillet, P. (1997) Arthritis Rheum. 40, 1670-1679). Contralateral knees were injected with saline to serve as control for the experiment. Disease parameters were clearly measurable within three to four weeks following injection. Animals were injected weekly with various doses of peptide (SEQ ID 36 (FIG. 20A)), beginning with the concentration that was shown to be effective in in vitro assays, 250 nM. Saline and BMP-7 (500 ng=50 uM) were injected for negative and positive controls, respectively. Joints were X-rayed to measure joint space changes as an indicator of the progression of OA (Messent, E. A., Ward, R. J., Tonkin, C. J., and Buckland-Wright, C. (2005) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13, 463-470).

All animals were sacrificed 1, 2 and 3 weeks post injection of MIA. Isolated joints were analyzed by Micro CT to measure cortical bone, trabecular bone and cartilage of the patella, femur and tibia, the production of chondrophytes and tissue mineralization in response to treatment. Total mineralization in the patella, femur and tibial cartilages, as well as subchondral bone, was calculated with Scanco μCT software. Micro-CT was conducted with a Scanco uCT 35 (Scanco Medical, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) system. Scans of 15 μm voxel size, 55 KVp, 0.36 degrees rotation step (180 degrees angular range) and a 600 ms exposure per view will be produced from joints immersed in phosphate buffered saline.

Whole patella for total, cortical and trabecular bone, 3 mm of both distal femur and proximal tibia for cancellous bone, the individually defined volume between patella and femur and fixed volume of joint between femur and tibia were evaluated. The Scanco μCT software (HP, DECwindows Motif 1.6) was used for 3D reconstruction and viewing of images. Volumes were segmented using a global threshold of 0.4 g/c for bone and 0.25 g/c for soft tissue. Cortical bone was evaluated for tissue mineral density (TMD) and thickness of the cortex. Bone volume fraction (BV/TV), surface to volume ratio (BS/BV), thickness (Tb.Th), number (Tb.N) and separation (Tb.Sp) was calculated for the trabecular bone. Cartilage was analyzed for total volume (TV), mineral to total volume ratio (BV/TV) and apparent mineral density.

TABLE 5 Acute Treatment Week 4 Micro CT (n > 3) Normal OA Control pxtx001-1 BMP7 Patella BV/TV 0.7566 +/− 0.011 0.6952 +/− 0.054 0.7075 +/− 0.039 0.6846 +/− 0.084 TbN 7.3364 +/− 0.240  6.242 +/− 0.224 6.6528 +/− 0.564 6.2122 +/− 0.169 Femur BV/TV 0.3603 +/− 0.086 0.2103 +/− 0.085 0.2201 +/− 0.086 0.2245 +/− 0.066 TbN 5.7179 +/− 0.951  3.540 +/− 0.675  4.075 +/− 0.877  4.200 +/− 0.830 Tibia BV/TV 0.2773 +/− 0.047  0.157 +/− 0.063 0.1469 +/− 0.057 0.1757 +/− 0.087 TbN 6.0330 +/− 0.397 4.0766 +/− 1.045 4.2140 +/− 1.021 4.9095 +/− 0.719 BV/TV = The ratio of bone volume to total volume; TbN = trabecular number; Normal = age-matched untreated; OA Control = experimental OA and saline; pxtx001-1 = 250 nM peptide; BMP 7 = 500 ng. OA was induced with one injection of mono-iodoacetate followed weekly through week 4 with infrapatellar injection.

Following microCT analysis, joints were, decalcified, paraffin-embedded, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or saffranin O (for total proteoglycan content). Grading was assessed by the OARSI scale (Pritzker, K. P., Gay, S., Jimenez, S. A., Ostergaard, K., Pelletier, J. P., Revell, P. A., Salter, D., and van den Berg, W. B. (2006) Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14, 13-29) for pathology. FIG. 23 shows histopathology results of the present experiment comparing normal (top), control (middle), and peptide inhibitor treated (bottom) stained with both safranin-O (right), and hematoxaylin+eosin (left). Histologically, the peptide treated joints have a lower grading on the OA scale than the untreated joints as evidenced by proteoglycan content and abnormal chondrocyte morphology. (FIGS. 24-35).

Example 11 Joint Space XRay Analysis of the OA Rat Model Treated with Inhibitory Peptide

For X ray analysis, the distance from the outside of the femoral head to the angle created by the calcaneus and the gastrocnemius tendon was measured and this distance was kept consistent for each joint. Both medial and lateral views were taken for each limb to gather more accurate measurements of the joint space and to duplicate data. We measured the shortest distance from the tibial cartilaginous surface to the femoral cartilaginous surface (joint space) with the aid of a high quality metal microcaliper and clear plastic ruler. The distance between the radiation source and the tissue was kept constant at 43.4 cm (distance to the film was kept at 85.9 cm). The kilovolt peak was kept at 50 kVp while the milliamp seconds were set at 1 mAs for all radiographs. We used a CMX 110 model x-ray machine by General Electric. Electron dense caliper set at 1 mm was included in each x-ray to allow for proper measurements. (FIGS. 36 and 37)

Stride tests were also administered weekly during the course of treatment to determine functional mobility in the animals. (FIG. 38). Briefly, rat's hind paws were inked, the animals were then timed while they walk a short path and the distance between hind leg strides was measured (Hruska, R. E., Kennedy, S., and Silbergeld, E. K. (1979) Life Sci. 25, 171-179).

Example 12 Chondrocyte Model

Primary chondrocytes from early and late hypertrophic stage were cultured from Day 17 avian upper sternum. Late hypertrophic chondrocytes were isolated from the core region of the avian sterna. Following 3-4 hours collagenase and trypsin digestion, cells were centrifuged and filtered through 0.45 um Nitex filter. Isolated cells were resuspended in 1.2% alginate and forced into beaded structures with 102 mM CaCl₂ and rinsed in 0.15M NaCl for a final density of 5×10⁶ cells/ml. Alginate bead cultures were covered in 2 mls complete serum free DMEM high glucose media including 1 mM cysteine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin. L-ascorbic acid was added to the culture at 30 ug/ml on day 2 and 50 ug/ml on day 5. Time course treatment was performed at 6, 12 or 24 hours with 10 nM, 100 nM, 250 nM PxTx001-1 or 6.5 uM commercially available MMP13 specific inhibitor (Calbiochem). Following a quick dissolution in 0.5M EDTA to release cells from alginate cultures, total RNA was isolated through Trizol method and reverse-transcribed via SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). cDNA samples were subjected to QuantiTech SyBrGreen (Qiagen) real time PCR. Samples were loaded into a 96 well plate in triplicate as 1 ul or 2 ul cDNA for each condition and primers respectively. Expression of markers of chondrocyte maturation (collagen type X, MMP13 and alkaline phosphatase) was compared to an internal standard of 18srRNA using ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Fold difference compared to untreated cultures was graphed using Prism Graph Pad and statistical analysis of one-way ANOVA and standard error of the mean were calculated with associated software. (FIG. 40).

Cytotoxicity was assessed by Alomar Blue Assay (Invitrogen) on primary chondrocytes and a monocyte cell line incubated for 24 hours with PxTx001-1. Absorbance was recorded at 570 nm for every hour up to 24 hrs to monitor both proliferation and metabolic activity. (FIG. 39). Toxicity in vivo was determined by blood analysis from rats that had been injected with the peptide as described previously. Total cell count, blood components and serum proteins were measured (Table 5). All parameters measured were within normal ranges.

TABLE 5 1 injection 4 injections Normal Range Renal Function BUN 15 18 9-21 mg/dL Creatinine 0.4 0.3 0.05-0.65 mg/dL Liver Function AST 99 95 39-111 U/L Alk Phos 272 194.5 16-302 U/L ALT 56 52 20-61 U/L Total Bilirubin 0.3 1.1 0.1-0.7 mg/dL Cholesterol 74 67.5 20-92 mg/dL CBC WBC 3.6 4.55 (5.5-11.0) × 10{circumflex over ( )}3/ul RBC 5.59 6.9 (5.5-10.5) × 10{circumflex over ( )}6/ul

Although certain presently preferred embodiments of the invention have been specifically described herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains that variations and modifications of the various embodiments shown and described herein may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only to the extent required by the appended claims and the applicable rules of law. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A synthetic compound with binding affinity for a hemopexin domain of a MMP protein or a matrix metalloprotease (MMP) substrate protein, wherein the compound is able to competitively inhibit binding the MMP to the substrate protein.
 2. The compound of claim 1, wherein the compound comprises a cyclic or linear peptide or peptide mimetic of between 5 and 50 amino acids with greater than about 50% identity to a MMP peptide selected from SEQ ID NOs:16, 104, 105, 106, or
 107. 3. The compound of claim 2, wherein the peptide or peptide mimetic comprises amino acids 264 to 272 of SEQ ID NO:16 MMP sequence.
 4. The compound of claim 3, wherein the peptide or peptide mimetic is cyclical.
 5. The compound of claim 3, wherein the peptide or peptide mimetic is linear.
 6. The compound of claim 3, wherein the peptide or peptide mimetic includes 7 of 9 amino acids from the amino acids 264 to 272 of SEQ ID NO:16 MMP sequence.
 7. The compound of claim 6, wherein the peptide or peptide mimetic is cyclical.
 8. The compound of claim 6, wherein the peptide or peptide mimetic is cyclical.
 9. The compound of claim 3, wherein the compound inhibits the activation of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ).
 10. The compound of claim 1, further comprising a binding domain.
 11. The compound of claim 10, wherein the binding domain binds hyaluronic acid.
 12. The compound of claim 1, wherein the compound inhibits the cleavage of collagen.
 13. A composition comprising the peptide or peptide mimetic of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
 14. A method for inhibiting the activation of TGFβ comprising the step of contacting a TGFβ large latent complex with the peptide or peptide mimetic of claim
 1. 15. A method for treating an indication selected from the group consisting of osteoarthiritis and cartilage degeneration, in a patient in need thereof comprising the step of administering to the mammal an effective amount of the peptide or peptide mimetic of claim
 1. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the peptide or peptide mimetic is administered by a step selected from the group consisting of subcutaneous injection, application of a cream, balm, lotion, or transdermal patch, or oral or nasal medication.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the method of administration is injection into the joint space or cartilage of the patient. 